Dorkington

You people confuse me.

Yes.

Generally speaking, a QB that is in the top 10 in performance over the course of their career is likely to end up in the HoF. At least imo.

Wait, am I not allowed to learn something new?

How long should a GM be given until they find a Hall of Fame level QB?

Packs of Muslims raping women at concerts? "Learn" something new every day here.

Are historians more likely to be liberal, or do you think survey runners purposefully introduced bias into the survey by only choosing left leaning historians?

How many QBs* can 'lead' a team to a SB win? To me, probably just Brady and Rodgers. The rest of the QBs in the league depend on having a halfway decent defense, and a competent running game, at the very least.

Seems like the WH and the 'fake news' organizations are going back and forth on this: https://twitter.com/AP/status/832642569641160704 https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3467508-Trump-National-Guard-Draft-Memo.html?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP https://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/8001743/Implementing_the_President_s_Border_Security_and_Immigration_Enforcement....0.pdf

Rasmussen has Trump with a 55% Approval Rating. Gallup has Trump with a 40% Approval Rating. Interesting disparity.

I'd prefer Foles over Romo... not because I think Foles is better when healthy, I just don't think Romo is going to last longer than 3 games. (Edit: I'm saying this with the assumption that Tyrod is gone, since that's what the prevailing thought seems to be.)

I'd love to see an in depth analysis on how you reached this conclusion.

He fell off as the season went on, that's my only concern with him... he *is* getting up in age.

I'm not convinced that he'd make the same moves on a team that lacks an elite QB.

We've given up on Ragland already? Tough crowd.

To be fair, the QBs and receiving routes that Woods has had, doesn't exactly favor YAC. Not that Woods is a great athlete in that regard, but still... those numbers are skewed by playing here.

It's not surprising, since he's a mid level QB. He has pros and cons. He's obviously not great, but at the same time we could do a lot worse. Keeping Tyrod, imo, fully depends on our other options.

As long as they are under cap, shouldn't the coaching staff be the ones making roster decisions?

So if I understand this thread correctly... anyone 35 and under sucks? If so, what does it say about their parenting (Generally Baby Boomers and Generation X)?

Think about how maintenance works right now. Usually one, or a small group, for tens or hundreds of deployed machines. Coders? Coders make the base, that can be installed thousands wide. An efficient robot could replace multiple humans, and multiple robots would only be supported by a couple humans. So yeah, "everyone" could learn how to do the work, yet the jobs wouldn't be there.

Either UBI, or increasing subsidization of basic necessities (food/housing/education/healthcare) is going to be absolutely necessary as we further automate jobs away. I don't think we'll realize that as a country until it's too late though.

Why do I check these threads... sigh.

- Rumors say the Bills are keeping Tyrod - Rumors say the Bills want Cardale to start Ok. Whatever you say, media.

So Bills fans and Bills analysts hate Tyrod, everyone else in the league thinks he's the best QB option if he becomes available. Sounds about right.