
mpl6876
Community Member-
Posts
985 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by mpl6876
-
Just thought you guys might be interested. I have bought several jerseys from them. Very good quaility and embroidered names. They cost $40 bucks or so which is a great price. Note, items are made in China and that might be a deal breaker for some of you. Website is www.tarajersey.com. Attached is the link below for anyone interested. Website www.Jersey101.com under construction. Website is www.tarajersey.com
-
Did you listen to the NFL network link I post regarding the Bills and Jamie Dukes and Charles Daivs? What did they say that is so out of line that you would totlally disregard what Dukes says? Still waiting for a legitimate reply instead of "slinging insults."
-
It is "implied."
-
Anyone want to know what a idiot thinks?
mpl6876 replied to bills_red's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I read the article and I must say I agree with about 85% of what the author wrote. (1) The 0-16 comment I disagree with. (2) Woods and Levitre comments as being terrible I strongly disagree with. (3) The Toronto referrence I disagree with. Otherwise, I feel the rest of the article was quite accurate. Sounds like I could have written it myself. Perhaps, the author has read many of my post because there is a common theme between us. However, I can't take credit for such a well thought out article. Funny, how someone who criticizes the Bills is an Idiot? -
Refer to http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-32-teams-in-...2-Buffalo-Bills Now you tell me what Jamie Dukes and Charles Davis said should be "disregarded" as you put it. IMO, they are knowledgeable and correct in their assessment of the Bills.
-
You are totally unprofessional. I just personally thanked him for one post. You should start checking your own inventory...
-
Totally unprofessional post.
-
Finally, some common sense thinking! Great post.
-
I really agree with your post. I have been saying this ever since I joined the forum. It's refreshing to hear a realistic viewpoint instead of this "pie in the sky" verbiage.
-
I am hoping that I am wrong.
-
Very good post and I am impressed with you Bills knowledge. As far as I'm concerned, keep the post coming because that was impressive.
-
I understand stand what your saying 100%. My only thought was when Clausen was on the board at 41 I was jumping for JOY. I thought maybe wrongly so he was a "steal" at 41. Not a reach. for that matter, McCoy might have been decent value too. Bottom line is the Bills didn't think ether was worthy.
-
Welcome to ignore. Your are my first. I am sure that will delight you.
-
Go figure "to each its own" because I like nerdy John Clayton.
-
Thanks for a well tought out clearly written post.
-
That simply isn't true. The experts do know they teams some more than others but they all possess knowledge of each and every team. What they don't know is the outcome of how each team is going to perform.
-
Very good post and I agree with what you have said. Very realistic viewpoint.
-
You can go to "bat for him" all you want. I am not ready to take the plunge. I stand by what I said. I said he has been a "total failure so far" and that is hard to refute. He may turn into a solid great QB who knows? All I know is I am not going to stick my neck out and go out on a limb and pronounce this guy as the best kept secret in the league. That is crazy to me. Maybe he an be surprise comeback award or something like that. You make all the excuses in the word for his failures and some are valid. What you fail to mention is what kind of team is he on now. He is on a team that has struggled offensively for years, a new system and coach, an OL that has protection issues to keep it clean, and a WR core that is unproven and very young. Sounds like he has a hellava uphill battle to me? Something for you to think about Bill. No trying to be rude in anyway.
-
Let the fun begin. (1) Have you even read what you have written. I had to read it about ten times and I still can't believe it. This time I did fail off the chair. Don't worry I'm not hurt. Thanks for asking though. So following this train of thought. Would you have drafted Bradford if he was available at pick 9. Answer no because of what you stated above. Also, I guess your saying this year it doesn't matter who our QB is right? I can't agree with that either. Oh by the way will the system still be new next year. If it is forget about drafting a QB next year too. Flat out no exceptions there is reason to be concerned about our QB situation! (2) How can you sit here and say that we are a better team without TO? Have you looked at our WR roster? I suppose you think Johnson, Hardly, and Easley are better...He had 830 yards receiving and 5 TDs. I doubt any of those guys will come close to those numbers. How is that for facts! Also, don't down play his effectiveness with the young guys in practice, OTA's and training camp. He did help and could have continued to help our young wide outs who "weren't ready to see much playing time." That is where your statement falls apart. Lastly, he commanded attention and respect from opposing defenses. It was no mistake that "Revis" checked him 2xs. His presence opened up the field for the other receivers because at any moment he could had made a big play. Problem was the OL and QB not TO. Granted he lost interest and his play and effort suffered. To say we are a better team w/o TO is utterly irresponsible. (3)(4) Look at my potential LB roster. Kelsay, Torbor, Davis, Moates, Poz, Mitchell, Harris, Batten, Maybin, and Colemen. It will look something like that with Maybin and Kelsay at outside LB. I don't know about you but this core doesn't exactly wow me. Much more questions than answers and a new system to boot. Piss poor statement to say hey we looked so bad last year how can we be any worse....That is what you said right? Read it. I don't settle for mediocracy. Once again, you are minimizing the difficulty of the switch and they will be plenty of miscues. (5) You stated that (referring to our run D )"that things can only get better." You go on the attack and ask based on what? My "friend" you made the statement that things can only get better. Those are your words. I don't have to prove anything. The burden of proof is on you. My statement is 100% accurate. Things can get worse! Whether they do remains to be seen. Don't use "blankets opinion statement as if they are facts. You stand corrected. (6) Jason Campbell "blows" and "truly sucks." All I have to do is look at last years performance. Did you see him light up the Saints on national TV? Yes, the super bowl Saints in case you didn't know. He put up 360 plus yards and 3 TD's. Also, 340 yards vs the Lions but nevertheless its 300 plus yards. Additionally, he put up big numbers against San Diego and Philly (280 plus yards) who happen to be playoff teams. Lastly he threw for 20 TD's. He did all this with a shi t coach, a shi t OL, and a shi t WR's. I am not going to tell you he is this great franchise QB. I am not that naive. However, I am not naive to say that the guy "totally blows" and "sucks." Clearly, the above mentioned facts vindicate him out of your characterization. As for your fantastic ending narrative...Go blow smoke up someone else's as s. How do you like my drama filled response?
-
I don't care how you spin it. Did you watch the games last year? The OL wasn't very good and we are more likely to see more of the same. I ain't drinking anymore of that "kool aid."
-
Couple thoughts on qb Fitz
mpl6876 replied to Logical Reasoning's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I think Fitz gives us the best chance to win this season. He has what the others don't A command presence, a passion for the game, and most importantly he is not afraid to loose. Nevertheless, I think he is 'odd man out." He still isn't very good and has very limited upside. Also, I believe this regime isn't pressured to win this year. The QB who will have his chance to shine is Brian Brohm... -
Very strong statement for a guy who has been a "total failure" so far. I not buying it....