BILLS_ROC

Seriously, with a name like Tyrod no nickname is necessary. Although, Axle, Clutch or Lugnut might be slightly better, Tyrod > t-mobile for sure.

We all liked the guy, BUT I actually like that the team understands the importance of letting the nice guy go in favor of a more damaging weapon. It's a business and hard decisions have to be made. It's good to see they are able to make decisions independent of emotions. I doubt this move made anyone feel good. However, keeping all the old favorites around won't get Buffalo to the Supoerbowl.

His penalties will offset Incognito's penalties for 1/8 of our games.

...because as the Colts have proven, NFL teams are rewarded for tanking their season in order to land the first pick of the draft. There's no way the Colts, even with an injured Manning were the worst team in the NFL. Their strategy to replace Manning was to parlay that injury season into a first overall pick. I expect that someday, someone in the organization during that season will leak the fact that the Colts were instructed to lose in order to guarantee the number one pick... Oh and guess what.... that was the year Andrew Luck was in the draft... go figure. It went not just unpunished, but unmentioned by the media. Why not follow their lead? BTW I have no idea about college football, so I don't know if there is anyone coming up in the 2016 draft that would be worth betting the farm on.

Here's why the rule doens't make sense. If you run into the end zone with the ball, and are not tackled, therefore never hit the ground it is a touchdown. In fact it's a touchdown the moment the ball breaks the plane. So if you have the ball at a point that it has crossed the plane regardless of if you have completed the process of hitting the ground the touchdown should have already been ruled at the point tha the ball crossed the plane in Dez's posession or the moment Cal Johnson had two feet down. Having posession of the ball in the endzone should be a touchdown regardless of what happens next or else they need to say that anyone that scores a touchdown still needs to be tackled!

I fail to see what Wolverine has to do with Buffalo Bills football. Please stay on topic.

Fixed that sentence for you.

...thankfully. Not Peter Pan link

Due to concerns of slowing the games way down, I would be shocked if that ever happened. However, it might be reasonable to suggest that any penalty yielding a net yardage change in excess of 15 yards be reviewable. That would cut back on the number of game changing erroneous calls that we have to deal with.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1891&dat=19971221&id=QrwfAAAAIBAJ&sjid=D9gEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4530,2515918

Well, if Orton doesn't throw into double coverage PAST two wide open crossing routes, then yes, we could expect things might be different with Orton. Any QB that can even begin to process what's happening after the snap when it doesn't involve a CB falling down or someone being open in all directions by 8+ yards will be an improvement. I think the play calling is far less of a problem than not taking advantage of receivers who get open.

FYI - Here's what 18.6 grams looks (on the scale) like if the linked image is of a calibrated scale... http://www.southernc...88-280-6839.jpg

Kiko has not yet undergone surgery for his knee, which inexplicably disassembled itself earlier this summer. His medical team is having trouble finding a way to cut him open.

Marshawn is so fat he jumped up in the air and got stuck.