Jump to content

Tim Tindale

Community Member
  • Posts

    221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Tim Tindale's Achievements

Practice Squad

Practice Squad (3/8)

255

Reputation

  1. I wonder if Collinsworth caught that guy called “Josh Allen” run a bit over the last few years…
  2. Some of our castoffs are finding their way… MVS, who looked totally lost for us, has had two nice games back to back for the Saints.
  3. Poona Ford with another sack! Could not get on the field for us last year.
  4. Noticed it too. He looked gassed. Epenesa should have been in
  5. Given this rule, if I’m a QB, I jump and “not fumble” every time I’m about to get sacked. It’s a lot of saved possessions in a season, given more manageable down and distance thereafter. It’s why it’s a dumb rule - you are incentivizing bad behavior (essentially grounding), imo.
  6. I actually don’t think we are that far apart, but I’m in shock at how open some of these targets (RB’s, WR’s, and TE’s) are running. Not to mention, this team is always in an advantageous position - 2nd or 3rd and short. That tells me that a lot is going right to make this look easy - scheme, run-blocking, protection, etc. But, a lot is clearly happening as fans we cannot see, especially at the WR position, including crisp, efficient route running, run blocking (and likely some blocking after the catch), no drops, no illegal motion, no taking plays off, no making terrible decisions on option routes (looking at you Gabe). In other words, no eye candy that you would point to as a splash play, but notion that this is plug and play… Steph and Gabe couldn’t do it and other teams aren’t doing it. But, the eye test says “man, these guys are running wide open”. Josh is putting the ball on target, of course, and making the right decision with the ball. This is as wide open as I can recall our targets being on game day. Some of this has to be very efficient route running, which we as fans would not appreciate.
  7. I disagree. I think “fine” minimizes just how difficult it is for an offense to look this seamless. Everything looks easy. I’m sure most of us have played sports who are fans. How often have you been on teams - or faced teams - that execute on an elite level and make it look easy? It’s rare, but especially at the professional level. For that to be true, I’d submit that the pieces in aggregate aren’t “fine”. They are doing their jobs extraordinarily well, and most likely, the pieces fit together uniquely symbiotically. My hunch is that not any NFL WR can be plugged in with the same result. After all, Diggs and Gabe, in the same offense, made everything look hard and it was a grind even in the back half of last year. I respectfully disagree with the assessment of “fine”. When it looks this easy, the pieces are fitting uniquely well.
  8. Keep running the football, make the game a grind.
  9. I heard that neither kids or pets trust Claypool. PASS.
  10. Like a more refined Waterboy.
  11. Given how raw and athletic he is, I wonder about TE or FB rather than T. Put the ball in his hands.
  12. Humph. I had him ranked #238 on my board. But, a top 5 on my Major League Rugby board.
×
×
  • Create New...