dayman

The only reason we are talking about this is the last sentence of the article. And in the case of Zuckerburg, he was lucky. There are a bunch of reasons he made that much money so young but yes, as per the last sentence, luck was one and a big one. And stop thinking I'm somehow railing against work and saying everything is luck..I'm saying to cash in at a certain level and at a certain age then that takes luck...that fortune is enormous.

Please continue to talk about the virtues of work and putting your nose to the task PPP. I can almost see the hard-ons you all have in my computer screen... And Donte...of course this isn't any different...but here on this board we are not allowed to mention the obvious truth everyone in the real world, and certainly every uber successful person in te real world, knows...which is ya need luck. Plain an simple. Somehow this age old truth doesn't register with the old grumps on here looking for excuses to spout off on the value of work and how 'liberals' don't know about it...you make billions you had luck. Period. You almost certainly had a bunch of other stuff going for you, but luck was on your side too.

Only on PPP does retarded "we built that" political sentiment extend so deep down in the bones that it becomes an issue, or requires explanation, to state that Zuckerburg was lucky.

Boy I tell ya some people who post here...lol...just classic

When i was in high school our valedictorian had, literally, an impossibly high gpa. He came from another school that had a program our school does not have and thus his gpa was actually higher than was even possible for anyone who spent all 4 years at our school. Is that fair? No. Does anyone cry for someone who is near the top of class but doesn't get a meaningless honor? No

also..once again he didn't create this. He packaged it well at a good time. And in any event, not taking anything away from it...just saying...of all people he was lucky...talented and all that yes obviously worked hard...but lucky as hell

Generally if facebook was the invention of that...you would be more persuasive. Nothing against facebook...just saying in terms of many of the top Cali Internet/tech companies...that one there is as lucky as it gets...separate yourself from the tax part of the topic of which I don't mean to connect the luck part but yes he was extremely lucky

Oh I thought there was such thing as luck that didn't involve a literal loto win.

Stevie is a full notch below top level...w/ Megtron level being a separate level from top...

He invented facebook. duh

Give me some quantities to start off experimenting with

pretty hard to put worchestire on anything and make it less Buffalo

That sounds amazing I will make it a few times to find a good mix. This is what I was looking for.

Stop sucking up to Obama Tasker your love for him is shameless....

LOL...Mark is a talented guy but yes he got real effin' lucky... In any event the comments are true he should pay in nickels

it was jaw dropping...they were absolutely dominating...lob city...highlight reel....slama jama...whatever you want to call it it was insane...but they will be destroyed tomorrow and crash back to earth

I have been wondering about this I want to branch out from making simple plain hot wings and make something better...it doesn't have to be a home made recipe it can just be something from a restaurant but it must be suitable for Bills games not simply a "good" flavor. Do not leave me disappointed Bills nation. You have a reputation to uphold. May not be the reputation you want, but it's the reputation you deserve.

I know a few people born in Canada for the sole reason of securing dual citizenship...these are people who would have been just American...so....everybody just go crap out babies everywhere...

No story on who slipped it in? Right or wrong if it gets people riled up some of those who got it in should speak on it.

Nobody is ever going to tax you for Internet use.

If we take a 2nd round LB it's hard to believe he wouldn't be the guy if there.

Well the general point that you can get very nice cars for reasonable end prices is true...the quality of affordable cars is up...

I don't know how many times i have to say this on this board but here it goes again...ahem..."savings is for asian countries"...thank you

can't really get into looking into this one right now for some reason but it looks like they're battling over what standard will be used in the analysis...which as often is the case in the law....will likely make a huge difference....the short of anti-trust is that it's the unreasonable restraint on trade (read into the law) and as such there is a balancing...a weighing of the procompetitive benefits and anticompetitive effects (this is called "the rule of reason")...but some things are so obviously anticompetitive the court refuses to hear evidence supporting the procompetitive effects (this is called "quick look")...you can see why this argument of which of these approaches to use is so contentious...hugely important for the drug company and also a tough burden for the gov't to meet in showing that this is illegal "per se" edit: looks like after just reading the commentary the court is very interested in thinking about what the inquiry will be on full scale rule of reason analysis and how important the strength of the patent claim is to taht inquiry and how insane the litigation can get...

idk too lazy to look now but here is a link if you want a bunch of the stuff in one shot: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/federal-trade-commission-v-watson-pharmaceuticals-inc/?wpmp_switcher=desktop