The bottom line is there is no negative effect of having Tebow if you get him for dirt cheap and everybody knows he will almost never play except for a few spots as a gimmick player. He is getting closer and closer to the point where someone can have him on those terms. But he is not there yet.
Seems fair to me. Perhaps they should get a bonus instead of reduction though. But the idea all non-repubs are opposed to ideas like this...or drug testing for UI benefits...not true
If Marrone drafts him in the first he'll be fired in 3 years unless the kid does something nobody but Marrone thinks he can do. Also, Marrone probably knows this. So...it's unlikely and if he does we know he believes in him.
Gibberish gon' gib. Blah blah blah I posted critically of all polls and analysts who said Obama had a strong lead and despite being dead wrong I was right. Gib gib gib
Of course this amendment must be read in light of other amendments after it, including those ratified after it...particularly that big one after the civil war and the legal interpretation that followed
...well this is pretty obviously unconstitutuional...if SCOTUS were 9 Scalia's maybe...but seriously...what is with this provocative legislation on the state level?
I have heard some of you talk about your careers at times and many seem to pride themselves on solid process management. Anyone have a link of wisdom to impart on the subject? Perhaps a scholarly article of manageable size although anything would do...but not a book we're talking something to read tonight.