dayman

This issue is a "fun v. no-fun" issue and nothing more. Sherman is awesome.

Nobody is saying "BOOM!" is needed. "BOOM!" is just awesome.

Not sure if this was posted already but Sherman wrote a little op-ed: http://mmqb.si.com/2014/01/20/richard-sherman-interview-michael-crabtree/ As far as Crabtree being a top-20 NFL receiver, you’d have a hard time making that argument to me. There are a lot of receivers playing good ball out there, and Josh Gordon needed 14 games to produce almost double what Crabtree can do in a full season. And Gordon had Brandon Weeden, Brian Hoyer and Jason Campbell playing quarterback. BOOM!

He was no Alan Simpson but the nation will miss him.

Manning v. Brady is probably the best overall story line in NFL history. It should win this poll.

Omaha! Omaha! Broncos and 9ers win today.

Evans is the guy imo.

Either way we don't have to go #1 to get better at OL. We may have to go #1 to truly change the passing dynamic.

lol I think you overestimate the national stage.

I find it hard to believe Christie had nothing to do with this personally and I do think it has the potential to sink him. It is a shame imo b/c I kind of like Christie.

This thread is a decent barometer as to people who are worth having a discussion about this stuff and people who aren't. I now see the utility of it.

You're being kind. There is no point to any of this. Thread. Article. Etc.

That is a point? I mean creative response there Tom but that point isn't in the article is it? The article is completely nonsensical as far as I can tell...

Am I missing something or is the point of this article that a massive group insurance plan provided through an employer is better than an individual plan?

https://twitter.com/...196922247225344 Perhaps the Bills will make it now? Perhaps not.

Fans would love it if they said: "Hey, we !@#$ed up, Sorry fans...but here's another try w/ this guy."

Drew Brees owes his entire career to Sean Payton...the best coach in the league.

Eagles are probably the most ideal from 10,000ft.

I was trying to say that we would trade Byrd and our 3rd for a 1st.

Example: Tag Byrd. Trade Byrd and a 3rd round pick to Pitt or Dallas for their middle 1st pick. Then take a good WR and TE (or OL) on the first night of the draft. To me, this would be a good deal for the Bills (considering it looks like we will lose Byrd either way). Do you agree? Is this even something you think another team would go for?

I would love to have 2 1st round picks and nab that TE and one of the better WRs. Trade Byrd, maybe our 2, and move back and end up with 2 middle-round picks...that would be awesome.

Hey I say we go aggressive. If the QBs go early and we can't move up for a reasonable bargain then fine...take the best skill player available. But if we have a shot to land a good QB prospect we had better take it. Take it now and forever until we have at least consistently average QB play (hint: we don't have that now and we have no signs that we will ever have it w/ EJ)

You're probably right. Kluwe is better than what we had last year. In any event, Kluwe slammed his ST coach in the piece. To write that would take some balls if it didn't happen...so yeah that probably did happen and that guy looks terrible. Honestly HC doesn't look great either...

Who hasn't won or lost a fantasy game on a stat correction?

I wonder what happened 600 years ago that was more audacious.