dayman

IDK I think that's pretty funny. A bit too far? Yes. But still hilarious. Have a sense of humor. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwzqCKCrrAw

http://www.timesofisrael.com/nothing-funnier-than-a-kidnapping/

Gasol just choked it away for Spain against Russia it was great. He let up the 3 personally then missed a free throw to tie it. National hero.

Mitt once beheaded a gay kid in rich boarding school didn't he? I think I remember that from earlier in the campaign

Bra on. Kinky factor.

When I was a kid I could do a rubik's cube in seconds b/c I'm an exceptionally smart person. Pre-youtube btw. That's who you are dealing with when you joust with me intellectually. A Rubik's genius. Tread lightly my friend.

I hate you. You bigot! I hate you, you heathen! Karma B word! Oh no you didn't! Oh yes I did BOOM! Chik-Fil-A! Uganda hate groups! Pickle on a delicious bun! Most delicious protest ever! Jesus meets free speech I just got an erection! You are the worst poster ever. No you are a terrible person. No you are terrible. I'm tan and thin and quite frankly 10% gay the perfect amount for 2012. Ladies love me. Check my jeans. Freedom. Hate.

Stay classy PPP. Chik-fil-A lets all act like idiots! woo! Chicken!

I got news for you, you have been living in America before Obama became President.

God bless you and God bless America. Country first! So long as country is "me and my view."

This "debate" has come to an end.

It really is just on and on and on in a circular discussion at this point. And it's good it's that time and eventually we can all go vote and be done with it. My hope is simply that whoever wins out this time, be it Obama or Romney...we all just go with their plan and encourage our representatives to at least not obstruct...they don't have to compromise themselves (and there is a place for the opposition party and minority views) but they will have to compromise issues in the end for the country and if they can't then don't vote for them. More than anything this endless jousting is what hurts us all the most. So we can all go vote for our guy as president but I would hope that there's an opportunity to vote for your guy in the congressional races that shares your views but also understands they owe a duty to work with other elected officials to govern. In any event this election will be decided on the basis of who is the better singer, and who does and doesn't hate gay people, and who has a dancing horse, and who is a black foreign socialist, and who is a rich fat cat who fired the neighbor and so on...but whoever wins that nonsense (and in doing so will likely carry their party to the Presidency and at least 1 chamber of congress) wins. And while there will be compromise it shouldn't be filibuster mania and broken congress round 2. It's easy to say this now while both sides think there's a chance they win...but I just hope as a nation we can move on after the election.

Every bit the pragmatist I've come to know you as. We're wasting each others time anyway, we don't even operate of the same set of facts. I get it, I'm not a pragmatist I'm just a socialist ideologue in disguise and the unemployment studies be damned none of the intervention kept us from prolonged contraction and we'd have a better recovery right now if we did nothing. I know...I'm bad. If only I believed in some personal accountability and contributed 2 dead condos to Miami personally I would be better off. (lol...cheap shot I know don't take it personally)

Ok then I'll chalk you up to one of the many conservatives on this board waiting for the self feeding spiral to naturally fix itself who also complains about recovery that isn't booming.

I've talked about how I see the situation go read. Everyone in the economy b/c it forestalls the recovery and prevents any positive action F&F can bring to the help the spiraling mortgage crisis. All homeowners b/c their home value is through the floor. And yes, since this is what I know you are getting at, it would help those on the verge of default some of whom were irresponsible and some of whom were actually reasonable in taking the mortgage they took before the collapse despite their current situation. The point is I get the "I don't want to help people who can't afford mortgages they took out" argument and nobody is saying that isn't the obvious and ordinary position of everybody. This is not the time to get hung up on that for reasons stated over and over and over in this thread.

Now it really is just repeating things already said to ask that. I've posted at length to this subject.

When you think debt relief will help the mortgage market and the recovery, and it isn't happening b/c it isn't good for F&F's short term profits...then you think there's a little shaft to all of us. I'm not starting an occupy DeMarco movement here btw...I'm just saying. I'd like to see some action here.

More people should get on board with providing debt relief to the people to spur recovery. Are these bailouts of the F&F and while the people get the shaft not one of the original tea party gripes? (haha, just snarky comment there btw don't blow a load). So there we have it.

He may save F&F some money today but in the long run until the underlying problem is addressed housing stock will continue to decrease. And in any event half of foreclosures are F&F and they have taken on a public persona w/ the bailout...it's a complex issue and I get that not everyone thinks it will help. A lot of people do...help both the recovery and the long term stability of housing stock.

It's well known DeMarco views his mission as interim director as conserving F&F's assets, not restoring the market or aiding the recovery. Never mind their quasi-public (or just plain public) nature of the two firms post collapse, he isn't concerned with macro-policy.

Haha, I should have kept a list of the Tebow people. Where are they now?

Hmm..I agree probably don't see it as being AS bad as you do but plain and simple I do agree. It's a little tough to really tell b/c it's been so long since a non-Clinton democrat was in there and well..lets face it Clinton had it coming. And even going back before Clinton the media was totally different. But I agree generally. That said, that's the media. Mitt can't just complain about it. He should have some sort of media initiative brainstorm in his campaign b/c really the majority favoring Obama (both slightly and those that are totally in love) talk a lot about how Obama is good and Mitt sucks. I watch ... not a lot of Fox but some ... and they don't really talk a whole lot about Romney at least maybe I just don't see it. (O'Reilly anyway doesn't seem to be in love w/ Romney not too many Mitt stories at all it's almost strange) I mean, at some point if it's going to be a close election...Romney should try and win someone over, get something going on his own, get someone talking him up. Politically that just makes sense and I'm sure they know that and really have yet to roll out whatever they have planned for post-Tampa. It's a tough one but they have to at least do something so I'll be interested to see what happens there.

A lot of it is, some is totally against him, and some try and be fairly neutral. On balance it's in the tank for him but that's not really any different than it has been in the past and Republicans have won anyway. Romney should find a way (I don't know what it is) to be more open to them in a good way if possible. Maybe it isn't, maybe politically he should keep his shell strategy going...but ultimately if it is close I'm not sure playing everything so close to the vest will pay off.

Oh well sorry didn't catch that thread. In any event I really don't use this thread (personally) for discussion of the validity of anything. Just saying this will probably be a messaging deal they sell and then of course jobs numbers Friday. Next wave of new crap to fill the political analysis on daily cable shows and talk radio.

What's really interesting is how the Bills use their running backs as receivers. At times, Fred Jackson or C.J. Spiller will be the No. 2 receiver. hmmmm