dayman

I can't speak for the American people. To this day, I do believe that Bush had intelligence that there were weapons of mass destruction...however "over hyped" the lock-solidness may have been. To this day, probably you don't agree, I do think that there were protests in countries all over about a stupid video, apparently there may have been protests in Libya as well (not surprising at all), and there was an attack in Libya as well that was deliberate and willful regardless of the scope of the plan. Do I think there was a massive lie or cover-up? No. I do think the interplay between protests and attacks over all the countries was confusing in the media reporting...and likely confusing in intelligence that has to be right and thus must be slow. And yes, I do agree that the official position was still confusing beyond the point that the unofficial position became clear...in a situation like this...I don't see how that is surprising. I look at reasonable repubs both in congress and on message boards like a joke at time when they stand by and let insane people say stupid things. So don't take too much personal offense, but STFU about this old cranky white men schtick. It's stupid. Don't be stupid. People associate you with me wrongly since we both support the same presidential candidate, so don't be an idiot.

I am in awe at Repub surrogates keeping with this "unraveling" theme. When asked why...they can't answer...they should stop saying this.

Agree on both points. I mean I know I'm an Obama supporter over Mitt...but you can search...I've consistently "defended" Bush on those points and never dig into the man like many Repubs think all Dems do

No doubt, and so are you. It's all sizzle. It's not two men of substance it's two private organizations of sizzle. NOthing more. But it's entertaining. Hell I was at a GOP fundraiser last night....it was fun..and it was sizzle and there's nothing more desirable than to take the sizzle there and present it to everyone that both sides want to do.

I fully accept this is an issue where partisan feelings (even if not "Repub" or "Dem" straight up or whatever) effects how you interpret this. Willful act of terror, fixated on "pre planned," "attack period," "is the investigation too slow or is the region chaotic etc...all will effect anyone's view on this. Personally this attack and what I know on it, doesn't drive me to Mitt's foreign policy over Obama. Then again, everything Mitt has said is either ridiculous or the same as Obama while still somehow bashing him b/c of perceived "tough guy" attitude (which is ridiculous). If you believe had Mitt been President a few weeks ago he would have saved those people, that's your opinion. I don't believe that.

Mishandling a message (compared btw to Romney's handling of everything related to this) in an election year matched up w/ Obama's foreign policy record as a whole makes the realm of foreign policy as a whole a winner for Repubs? Every surrogate on Fox and CNN for Romney doubling down on defending the act of terror issue on behalf of Romney. Krauthammer doing his best to keep Libya in the game. Repubs will keep this alive for Romney certainly leading into next week. Also over under "Israel" being mentioned next week is at 50 IMO...but the entire post debate coverage on Fox is Libya that signals problems

Also the bottom line as Mitt conceded (rightfully so)...is that there will be stuff like this from time to time certainly in a middle east that is in a historic revolution as a region with so many radical groups. I mean if you can't basically say this is a scandal...people basically get it...it's terrible it's tragic and certainly people will want to know what happened but in the end..this "a group attack and consulate" = Obama is making the middle east unravel...that's not a winning argument...if they were smart given the botches so far they would scale back and use it as a knife and not a bazooka b/c it's effective as a knife but ridiculous as a bazooka. And when he says oil production has increased in response to a question about why gas prices increased the rebut is that federal land should be drilled more? Even when Obama has the comeback that the permits were not being used, retracted, and are in the process of being released.

BTW why did Romney think that cutting federal drilling while issuing more overall permits was a winner?

Not really sure what the high points for Mitt were...I mean I am not saying Obama slaughtered him but it seemed much better than Mitt

Nobody who doesn't support Obama will agree...but Obama did very well tonight. Much better than Romney.

"There's some jobs that just aren't going to come back" It's about time a politician said that

Candy had the transcript and corrected Romney! Literally calling a mistruth a mistruth period

Debates are insanely entertaining

Romney....certain parts of Obamacare extend medicare viability

I feel bad for Bush after this

Of course they ad up? Well by all means put it out on the internet and win the election today

Obama is night and day from the first debate

They were about to pull out lightsabers only Crowley's presence as the dark sith prevented it

This is the most aggressive town hall in history already lol

This plant kills...lol Oh ****...it's on

yes I got the goof and was regoofing...if you will

ah, makes sense

what the hell is MSM... I've seen this on this board a few times a google shows wikipedia saying it's a abbreviation for "men who have sex w/ men"

talking heads unanimously assume Americans do not care about foreign policy...idk if they're right or wrong you be the judge

Honestly Jill Stein must have designed that program b/c I don't think there has been a more powerful tool for her in her "campaign" process.