dayman

lol allow me to clarify, I think all libertarian candidates who have been contenders for POTUS are fraudulent in their promises of what they could/would actually accomplish (even more so than mainstream party candidates) ... I did not mean to say that all libertarians are frauds...which I know is exactly what I said

I think all libertarians are frauds, but like Mark Miller I would like to know why Gary Johnson is a fraud among frauds.

Yes, stupid is stupid.

Pretty sure i saw a poll a few weeks ago saying Americans would prefer Obama in the event of alien invasion. This is Axelrod at his finest. He's painting his legacy with this one

I've seen an interview with her before. She's grieving for sure, but she definitely acts like the president was baby sitting her 10 year old and let him fall down stairs. In any event, if someone asks u if security was optimal and u say what obama said...that's called no big deal. This topic is pathetic

Well clearly Johnson has no problem lying about Obama and Romney's views, he would fit right in w/ both of them on stage in a debate. Either Obama or Romney could checkmate him of course, with the simple question of "Do you realize you would not get done 1 single thing you say you want to do?"

You can always ignore the stupid

No problem. Ya I thought it was entertaining, both funny. Also thought Mitt told better jokes (felt like he also told more jokes but I didn't keep track).

Both funny. Mitt was heavier on roasting Obama...and it made his speech more funny. Paraphrase: "I know how to debate. Set up a straw man and attack it mercilessly. Big Bird didn't' know what hit him. But in the spirit of Sesame Street Obama's remarks are brought to you by the letter O, and the number 16 Trillion." hehe

IMO Mitt was very funny

Ya you would kill at the Al Smith dinner btw link http://www.breakingnews.com/topic/2012-elections here goes mitt now

not final b/c infallible, infallible b/c final...etc...

LOL I made my post in response to you saying you consider yourself a constitutionalist. So go on, what makes you say this? What does this even mean to you....

Tell me what why you call yourself a constitutionalist and then I'll label you (since you asked)

I would agree w/ that. It's electoral politics in all it's glory.

http://www.breakingnews.com/topic/2012-elections Anyone watching any of this? I don't even know if I'll watch it but may catch some to see if either guy is actually funny (Bush was pretty funny) 67th Annual Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner Thursday, October 18, 2012 The Waldorf=Astoria Keynote Speakers: President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney

Probably no surprise from here on out just a grind

classic

Ah! Forgot about the who will win. Nice. Keep these going, good. My votes won't change now, but if there was somehow an option to reduce the margin or certainty for the Obama vote I would utilize it.

You know there comes a point where successful actors always become this? Will Smith for instance is just Will Smith in most his movies...same can be said of DeNero...this is what happens when you get old and established.

I would get the book "The New New Deal." It is a left leaning author...but it holds no punches back it reveal the sausage making in all it's glory...without a doubt the best thing available to understand what happened. If you want to learn about the stimulus...this is THE thing to read first, and then you continue on of course from there to round out your understanding Opposing OBAMA's Stimulus in mass. They had many a stimulus proposal of their own...all of which got a majority of GOP support despite the versions being wholly different from themselves...and btw...700B was one that got support..so the idea it's about the money is ridiculous.The only common scheme to the GOP stimulus proposals was that they weren't Obama's. That's it. Money. Areas on influence. All over the place. It was politics plain and simple.

Of course some people got in on the action. All you need to do is study the stimulus to understand though, that as a bloc there was no cooperation in mind from the very beginning. And Arlen Specter...he's the one responsible for the damn Cocaine Monkey's the GOP then called ridiculous.

It comes of as partisan to say this. But this just isn't true. Plain and simple.

I do agree with the general point...but the actual fact is in his 2 years he passed a ton of extremely significant legislation. Whether you like it or hate it...within the first month of his Presidency he had done more than most do in 4 years and he had checked off about 70% of his campaign promises.

Describing yourself as a consitutionist is nonsensical