I personally get rid of the comp system. One change that should be made is a team should make an offer in order to get the comp pick. If you get a comp pick for losing a player you don't want you should not get a comp pick.
I had a woodchuck eat the heat shield and some wires a few years ago. I guess some manufacturers use materials that attract them. If I had not seen him run from the car I would not have believed it was a woodchuck.
People's palates are different. That the chef knows better is not a good business plan. I tend to avoid restaurants where they pair all the food and eliminate the choice for me. Maybe I don't want squash but it has been determined that it is better that way so eat your squash.
I guess I am in the minority - I thought he was average at best, more below average. Maybe he will continue to improve but this is an area to upgrade in the draft.
Darnold is on year 4 of his contract. So a team trading for him gives up a #1 for 1 year, 2 if they pick up the option? Not convinced this happens unless the think he really is a franchise guy.
Assuming he clears protocol, does this change the strategy if he has a toe issue and may be gun shy? Do you blitz more and make him hurry if he can not escape as well? Most pundits seem to think replicate the week 6 game plan but I suspect Fraser will change it up.