I see that this argument parallels the global warming argument:
You first must accept the premise of both which is, in the “global warming” argument that our planet is warming and in the “al Qaeda bleeding US” argument that we are going bankrupt.
Ok fair enough, there is plenty of scientific evidence to support both of these premises but not their arguments. This is where science ends and pseudo- science begins.
Al Gore will have you believe that we are the cause of global warming. Osama bin Laben will have you believe that al Qaeda is the cause of our bankruptcy.
Now it is possible that people are contributing to global warming just as it is possible that al Qaeda is contributing to our bankruptcy, but this requires proof of cause and effect not the speculation of two figureheads with an axe to grind. The two just do not support their arguments so it’s all BS.