hondo in seattle

Fair enough. But that's why I prefer more picks. Every pick is a throw of the dice. The odds of getting a winning roll are better when we have more chances to roll 'em. And yet... I find Whaley's enthusiasm infectious.

You may be right that Sammy will be a star. But you don't think there were any future Pro Bowlers - or maybe future Hall of Famers - still left at #9? We could have potentially had two Pro Bowlers with those two first round picks. Instead we have one. Watkins needs to become very special for this trade to make sense.

We essentially gave up two first round players to acquire one first round player?!?!?! With all our needs, wouldn't two first round players be better? I get why people like TXBILLSFAN say this goes beyond bold, it's reckless. It seems to me the spectrum of possibilities are... HUGE MISTAKE <<< ----------------------------------------- >>> BARELY WORTH THE PRICE Yet Whaley knows this and did the deal anyway. Apparently, he's pretty confident. I'm willing to suspend judgment until we see Watkins in a Bills uni. BTW, I do think it's awfully cool Watkins is a Bills fan.

I think the Bills want to move up but find the price too expensive. I believe Whaley's dead serious about giving EJ a better supporting cast and will draft offense with the first round pick. I'm thinking OT but wouldn't be surprised by a WR or TE. It depends on how the first 8 picks go down .

Thanks for a dose of human compassion. Our prayers are with Perry.

I'm not sure if the comparison is valid but I have to commend you on your memory. I doubt I would have ever again recollected the name "Perry Tuttle" in my life if you hadn't just mentioned him. For a first-rounder, he was pretty much invisible as a player. (Well, as a Bill. The Winnipeg Blue Bombers inducted him into their Hall of Fame).

Interesting - and critical article - on Fantex here: http://blogs.reuters...fantex-edition/ Here's the actual Fantex prospectus: https://fantex.com/fantex-ej-manuel-461919/prospectus

I'd rather buy shares in the Bills. But since that isn't a possibility, shares in EJ will have to do.

It seems we call all buy shares in the EJ Manuel brand. Fantex has purchased a 10% share in EJ's future brand income. It will start selling shares under the ticker symbol "EJML" at $10 a piece on May 5. I might buy $100 worth of shares just for fun, just to have some skin in the game. Anyone else in? http://espn.go.com/n...-brokerage-firm Here's how the EJ Manuel brand was valued: http://espn.go.com/blog/buffalo-bills/post/_/id/9258/dissecting-how-manuels-stock-is-valued

The more I read, the less l think the Bills are taking Watkins. Too many unnamed thrice-removed sources.

This sums it up pretty well.

If this actually happens, I'll be reading KH's posts very carefully in the future.

I used to be an army officer and was taught the Honor Code, "An officer does not lie, cheat or steal; nor tolerate those who do." But the Honor Code had a limited application in war. Every combat mission was laid out in a standard Five Paragraph Operations Order. One of the sub-paragraphs of a 5 paragraph op order was "Deception Plan." It was important to encourage the enemy to think we were doing something different than we actually were. I wonder how many NFL GMs intentionally put together a Deception Plan and how extensive and organized it may be. We heard last year that Nix supposedly made an effort to label Glenn as a guard. Do NFL GMs get together with their staffs each spring to put together their annual deception plan? Does that deception plan influence who they talk to at the combine? Who they fly in for visits? What Pro Days they attend? Do GMs call other GMs asking about trading up, when really they want to trade down?

Nice job, Mike!

In other words, nothing new here. We already know that the team couldn't be moved during the length of the lease. Thanks for clarifying.

I think the comment about winning one-on-one battles is misleading. I don't think Schwartz is opposed to scheming. But he wants to emphasize the important of individuals skills and the necessity of winning one-on-one. If your players aren't good enough to win one-on-one battles, the scheme won't really matter. The best defenses - whether 4-3, 3-4, hybrid, or something else - have good players. Having said that, I'm not super confident in JS. His resume has some successes... and some blemishes.

Ralph showed a lot of loyalty to Buffalo in his lifetime. I'm really hoping he was consistent and left some kind of instructions like this after his death.

My understanding is that the trustee (Mary) has a fiduciary responsibility to the other members of the trust. Mary is legally required to make a good deal for the trust - and therefore couldn't sell to JK at a huge discount.

First game I ever attended, with a friend and my friend's dad who bought the ticket for me. I was 14 at the time (1973). It seemed OJ was always a shoestring tackle away from breaking a long one. Every time he touched the ball, the people around me were on their feet.

Wow! I have to say, that's impressive fandom! My earliest memory (mini Max Anderson swallowing his tongue) doesn't compete with yours

Fred is a stronger, more versatile running back. C.J. is elusive and has crazy acceleration. But he needs space, and the OL and OC didn't create that space. For CJ to live up to his potential, we need better run blocking but we also need better offensive coaching (better play design, better preparation, better play calls).

Back in '88, I was serving as a lieutenant in the U.S. Army on the DMZ in Korea. Although I was an armor officer, I was for some reason tasked with working out the logistics for a visit by the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders - including helicopter rides to soldiers in the field. Their accommodations were far from first-class but the ladies never exhibited anything less than good cheer. My own soldiers were salivating over their arrival. When the Dallas cheerleaders showed up at our company toured the end of their visit, one of soldier's looked stunned and blurted out "Sally????" Turned out one of the cheerleaders was a high school friend & classmate of his. Since then, I can never say anything bad about cheerleaders.

Thanks for posting. Interesting in a sad kind of way. I read every post by the doc and the prognosis doesn't sound good. And apparently Jim's condition is extraordinarily painful. Best wishes...

I don't know Jerry personally and he might walk old ladies across the street and donate half his pay to charity. But after reading some of his columns, I'd expect him to be like this: * If you took him out to dinner at the Buffalo Chop House, he's nitpick the meal and tell you it's too bad Buffalo doesn't have a real steakhouse like Ruth Chris. * If you took him to Delaware park on a beautiful summer day, he'd comment on what a shame it was that Buffalo ruined Olmstead's vision over the years. * If you took him to a live Les Miserables show downtown, he'd find flaws with the performers and tell you the original London cast was better. * Even if you took him up to TO to see the National Ballet of Canada, he'd tell you why they aren't as good as the Kirov. In Jerry's world, every silver lining has a dark cloud. And I think his 'negative contrarianism' is journalistic gimmick. He goes against the flow and pours down rain on a sunny day just to be provocative. I'm okay with PR cheerleaders like Chris Brown. I enjoy balanced reporters like - nationally - Peter King or - locally - our own late Larry Felser. I don't enjoy Negative Nancies like Jerry and that's why I don't read anything with his byline anymore.

Mary is the trustee... which means she has a fiduciary responsibility to the trust. Legally, she can't just pick a lowball offer because she likes the bidder. Unless of course, there's some verbiage in the trust (or Ralph's will) that favors a buyer intent on keeping the team in WNY.