hondo in seattle

I dimly remember when we called him Bass-o-matic.

Didn't Anderson miss kicks on purpose to work his way off the team?

Before the season, I made this argument... Samuel and Shakir are legit NFL starters. Between Claypool, MVS, and Coleman, we just need one to step up - just one - to have a legit starting trio of wideouts. I thought the probability of having a competent starting group was pretty good. Yikes! I was wrong. Two are now gone and the remaining guys haven't shined. Thank god for the Amari trade!

I agree with some of this but I don't see the number of WRs set in stone at 5. I'm guessing it was more about our particular circumstance. MVS was only nominally better than our practice squad receivers, or the WRs available on other PSs. What point would be served by wasting a 53-man roster spot on a PS quality player? On the other hand, if we had 6 good, contributing WRs, I think Beane and McD would go with six.

I notice what you're saying but interpretted it a little differently. In interviews, McDermott often seems like a cold fish. Very rational. Not emotional. Doesn't divulge much. Reading between the lines, I think he's excited to have Cooper but didn't want to denigrate his current receivers by saying what a great addition he is and so repeated his typical mantra about football being a team sport: 'It's never just one guy.' Deflecting the question about leadership was a little odd. Given that Cooper is a prominent player who's been in the league for 10 years, it seems unlikely that McD doesn't know what kind of presence he has in a locker room. And yet that's what he claimed - the only thing he knows about him is what he's seen on tape. My guess is that McD's heard some negative stuff. Not enough to veto the trade but enough that he didn't have anything positive to say when asked that question and so he deflected.

That's my worry. Can we trade for a new OC too?

5 Pro Bowls. A 265 yard game against the Texans in December of 2023 so not over-the-hill yet. Decent speed (4.42), good agility & route running. Can line up in any of the WR slots and create separation. Has problems with drops (9 this year already, 7 last year, 11 the year before)... some injury issues... What am I missing?

I get your reasoning and it makes some sense. But... Most 3rd round draft picks are jags. Only 29% of them become full-time starters for 4 or more seasons. Fewer yet become Pro Bowlers. Amari Cooper is a proven commodity with 5 Pro Bowls - including last year. I'd rather have a Pro Bowler on a short-term rental than another jag. We have enough jags already.

There were four Bills defenders in the area versus three Jets receivers. They needed to cleanly catch the ball. We didn't have the same requirement; we just needed to knock it away. The odds were decisively in our favor. And yet...

Good attitude.

And opened up holes for the RBs.

Or shorten it to 'Zhamar Jamar' which I love.

This is one reason why I'm not a huge McD critic - other than his failure to find a good OC. I don't think Beane has yet given McD a Super Bowl quality roster. So I don't know why there's a chorus to fire McD for not getting to the SB. Beane hasn't built a bad roster. But every year there are rosters with more talent than ours. I think of the old saying, "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade." Beane gave Brady lemons. Shame on Beane. But Brady took the lemons and turned them into inedible prison slop.

If Beelzebub was sitting with me right now in all his evil glory and challenged, "If your prediction is right, I'll give you a fortune in Bitcoin. But if you're wrong, I'll make you push Sysyphus's rock up the Tartarus hill for the rest of eternity," I'd tell him that Joe Brady will have an awful game plan and the Jets will win. But Bub isn't here, so let's be sunnier: Bills 31 Jets 17

Unlike some others on this board, I think McD is a good head coach. I think he's good at defensive schemes, preparing the team during the offseason, preparing the team during game week, building teamwork, and motivating effort & hustle. But there's one critical task he has not been good at: choosing a capable OC. In my book, he's 1-of-4 . Daboll was imperfect but pretty good overall. Dennison, Dorsey, and Brady all underformed. Considering we have perhaps the greatest QB in Bills history, now is not a good time to play musical chairs with subpar OCs. I'm not sure what to expect tonight because Brady's a bit schizophrenic. But I have serious concerns about Brady's ability to generate offense against good defenses.

I'll probably be worm meat by then but I hope to look as good as Marv at that age.

Offense - Cook. His injury worries me, but he's been our most reliable offensive player. Defense - Douglas. He averaged a pick every other game last season but has none this year. Seems overdue.

The only players and ex-players I don't like are (1) crappy human beings - murderers, rapists, drug dealers, etc. and (2) crappy teammates - guys who didn't give their all for the team. As far as I know, Davis doesn't fit into either of these categories. Mostly I don't think about him, but when I do, I wish him the best.

I agree with the first part about Simms' expertise. I don't think the Bills need to be paying attention to him though. I can't imagine they're not seeing the same things. They're professionals and do this for a living. Knowing the problems isn't the same as knowing what to do about them, though.

Yep. With Downing's reputation being what it is, I wondered why Ulbrich is giving him the keys to the offense. Does he believe Downing will be better than Hackett? Is he making a change just to make a change? Or is he trying to minimize Rodger's influence by removing authority from Rodger's buddy?

Combining what Simms said with what Cover1 and others have pointed out in their video breakdowns... * Sometimes Josh makes bad decisions * Sometimes Josh makes bad throws * Our weapons frighten no one. * Because our receivers frighten no one, teams aren't afraid to blitz us and leave their DBs one-on-one. * Brady doesn't game plan or call plays very well. But other than these petty, easily-correctable problems, our offense is pretty darn good.

It's worse than that. Ulbrich said about Downing: he will have "the full say on the game plan and, ultimately, the plays that are called within the game." If Hackett isn't calling plays and isn't in charge of the game plan, he's really not the OC anymore. Ulrich is doing what Saleh supposedly wanted to do.

I didn't watch this video right away because I was afraid it would be depressing. Just watched it now. I was right. Bottom line: the players and coaches all sucked that game.

I thought the same. We needed a TD there. Mitch isn't a great QB but there's gotta be at least one pass play in the playbook that he can execute pretty well. Just one. That's the play I would have called against a defense that was clearly expecting a run.

Like Big Turk, I'd be up for anything. I wouldn't even mind seeing Tommy Prothro's "Formation Zero..."