ICanSleepWhenI'mDead

Grab my emergency zombie apocalypse response kit, my DVD of the Comeback Game (to preserve our culture and all), and high-tail it for my survival condo in an old missile silo in Kansas - - well, at least I want you to think it's in Kansas: http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/photos/best-us-places-to-survive-the-apocalypse/survival-condo

Here's a surprise - - three of helmet maker Riddell's insurance carriers say that the concussion-related health claims being made by former NFL players fall outside the scope of the insurance policies Riddell bought, so Riddell has now filed its own suit against those three insurance carriers: http://www.cnbc.com/id/47042055 P.S. Please make sure you have an operational sarcasm detector before replying to this post.

Is her name Kimberly Pruitt? http://www.theonion.com/articles/but-if-we-started-dating-it-would-ruin-our-friends,11473/

http://www.erie.gov/billslease/stadium.phtml

While I agree with you that a future owner of the Bills is likely to have more debt than Ralph, there is reason to believe that Ralph had about $128 million in team-related debt as recently as 2009: http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/130751-conventional-wisdom-bills-have-no-debt-service/page__p__2173076__hl__%2Bconventional+%2Bwisdom__fromsearch__1#entry2173076 I don't know where or how Forbes magazine got their info about Ralph's 2009 team-related finances, but Forbes is considered a generally reliable source of financial information by most people.

I'm a citizen, but if they don't want me to be distracted by the nurses I encounter at the Citizens Medical Center, then they are eliminating the wrong people from their applicant pool.

Found another consistent source - - apparently the rule used to be that an assistant coach could always interview for a coordinator job because it was considered a promotion, but that is no longer the rule: http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/bucs/content/nfl-teams-will-continue-be-permitted-block-assistants-under-contract

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/25/sports/football/stormy-honeymoons-for-two-new-nfl-coaches.html I found a link to an undated copy of the NFL's anti-tampering policy - - can't vouch for its accuracy, but FWIW: http://www.dawgtalkers.net/uploads/2009%20NFL%20Anti-Tampering%20Policy.pdf Schiano's comments about teams using "half-baked titles" seems to indicate that teams are at least claiming that an "assistant head coach" falls under the "head coach tier." As I read it, other teams could prevent Schiano from interviewing their current assistant coaches and coordinators (even without "half-baked titles") for the Buc's vacant coordinator positions because the NFL anti-tampering policy divides all coaches into only 2 categories - - (1) a head coach tier, and (2) everybody else. So by definition any assistant position coach, offensive or defensive coordinator, or even grand imperial pubah of special teams is interviewing for a lateral move (for purposes of the anti-tampering policy) if he interviews for a vacant coordinator position. Anybody read it differently?

You've said a number of things I agree with - - here's one: When you get off the soapbox and stop complaining about how access to justice isn't the same for everyone in our capitalistic society, let's talk about the part of your prior post that I still disagree with. Here it is: The parts I highlighted in bold simply aren't true. According to you, mere knowledge of someone else's intent to commit a crime is itself a "prevalent" crime in the US court system, and some laws are "clearly worded" to show that such knowledge alone is itself a crime. If that's true, it shouldn't be very hard or time consuming for you to provide one verifiable example of such a prosecution or the text of one such law. I get that (1) prosecutors have the ability to use the full weight of the government's justice machinery to roll over the poor, weak or stupid, and (2) poorly paid public defenders often aren't the sharpest tools in the legal shed. But that has nothing to do with how the criminal laws are worded, or whether mere knowledge of someone else's intent to commit a crime is itself often prosecuted as a criminal offense.

1. Mario Williams will go deer hunting in Jim Kelly's back yard and discover that what he actually saw were animatronic Christmas decorations that Jimbo never took down. He will quit the team and move to Kenya so he can hunt big game on safari; 2. Kelsay will find incriminating photos of the next owner of the Bills and get another big contract extension; 3. Some idiot will suggest that Ralph may have already granted an option to purchase the Bills to somebody in Toronto; 4. Fitz will retire and become an Amish elder; 5. ESPN's John Clayton will mysteriously disappear 3 days after an alien mother ship is sighted over Bristol, CT; 6. Doc and Mr. WEO will agree on something.

Sadly, if we had drafted a "punt catcher" to replace the legendary Chris Watson, we might not have lost that 6-3 game to Cleveland a few years ago. Let's not make that mistake again. While we're at it, let's draft a "kick-off watcher" who is able to watch kick-offs go through the end zone with a late lead against New England, rather than "pulling a McKelvin."

I just checked - - he's not there yet: http://www.jailexchange.com/CountyJails/Ohio/Stark/Stark_County_Jail_Inmate_Search.aspx

FWIW: http://law.justia.com/codes/louisiana/2011/rs/title14/rs14-26/ For an overview of various circumstances in which courts have considered whether sports violence is legally actionable (in either a civil or criminal case), see: http://sportslaw.uslegal.com/sports-violence/

I haven't bothered to look up whether the RICO conspiracy statute has been amended, or if the courts have changed their interpretation of it, but here's what one federal appeals court said in 1997 about what the government must prove to make out a RICO conspiracy case: http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/55087F3B51C2F08C85256F120065D7D8/$file/95-3157a.txt Sounds to me like your "friend of a drug driver" example is way off base. But then again, I have never claimed to have any particular education or work experience here, and may not be a "pretty informed dude."

You should be happy with the newest revision to the overtime rules: Finally an OT rule for the fans

Crazy Cleveland Tourism Video - watch more funny videos Or more seriously: http://www.ohiotraveler.com/northeast_ohio.htm

Disguised as Canadian realtors: Shelooksprettylifeliketome

No reason to think a military research lab would consider using a "fire-fighting" robot for any other purpose: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/09/robosoldiers-hi/#previouspost When the Navy starts arming their hydrogen-powered robotic jellyfish, don't say you weren't warned! http://news.cnet.com/8301-13639_3-57401801-42/robojelly-hydrogen-powered-robot-jellyfish-is-squishy-awesome/?tag=mncol;txt

To the OP: I had NFL Rewind for the first time last season - - if you have a fast enough Internet connection the picture is HD. You can check picture quality for your particular Internet connection by signing up for the preseason package - - price declines as you get closer to the regular season. I signed up for something like $5 when there was only 1 preseason game left just to check my video quality at home. If it's fast enough to get acceptable picture quality, you can then sign up for the whole regular NFL season for about $40. And if you want to stream Internet video to your TV so you can watch on a bigger screen, several options are explained here: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/02/22/savings-experiment-cutting-the-cord-on-cable-tvs-pricey-bill/?ncid=txtlnkusdail00000004 Good luck.

I think some nerd must have gotten a federal grant to build his own Terminator prototype. Either that, or SkyNet sent it back in time to kill Sarah Conner. Check out the sketch from the US Naval Research Laboratory here: http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/13/tech/innovation/robot-fire-us-navy/index.html The thing needs to throw grenades to fight fires?

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/26/tech/innovation/ska-telescope/index.html?iref=obnetwork Gets its name not from the ground area on which the dishes will be placed, but from the collective surface area of the dishes combined! Wonder if SETI will get any time on the array?

Interesting question. There have only been 35 left-handed QBs in the history of the NFL according to this (don't know if it's true): http://www.footballnation.com/content/steve-young-tops-list-nfls-greatest-left-handed-quarterbacks/11506/ and I'm sure many of them were obscure. I don't have an answer to your question, but here's a list of prominent lefty QBs - - maybe somebody who followed their careers closely would know what sort of OL adjustments, if any, were made because of their left handedness when they took over from their presumably right-handed predecessors: 1. Steve Young 2. Boomer Esiason 3. Mark Brunell 4. Scott Mitchell 5. Kenny Stabler IIRC, Brunell was on the Jets roster in 2010 and 2011, so the Jets have dealt with a left handed backup QB recently.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/26/world/americas/canada-ontario-legalizes-brothels/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn

It's debatable whether the human eye can detect the improved resolution of a 4k screen for typical screen sizes and viewing distances: http://carltonbale.com/1080p-does-matter

While there are exceptions to every rule, I think this is generally true. I'm not into fantasy football, but the following article has some pretty interesting tables showing receiver stats for guys drafted from 1998 through 2008 for their first four years in the league (only 3 for the 2008 draftees): http://www.footballdocs.com/WR_three_year_rule.html Ignore the fantasy football advice and and just look at the data tables - - while we might get lucky and draft a receiver who is an immediate stud, it's more likely that any WR we draft will take a few years to blossom. Just my 2 lira.