Bronc24

Amen.

http://gvnet.com/childprostitution/Philippines.htm http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/humtrafconf2/22/

Being gay is wrong, according to PAC, but apparently sex with 10 year olds, which is rampant in the Phillipines, is ok. Perhaps he should tackle that issue.

My link Thoughts?

From a Canadian fan's viewpoint, I get why, but the first few games have sounded like the game was played in a mausoleum. I agree with an earlier post that states perhaps a winning record will help create excitement in the stands. I still wish all the games were in the Ralph though.

The NFL had the monopoly on the idea football causes concussions? By that logic, I'm suing Budweiser for my breaking my arm when drunk. Bud withheld information that drinking 18 beer would leave me sh1tfaced.

Really? Thanks for the info.

Just going out on a limb here, but I don't think the Pack or the Pats are actively seeking QB upgrades at this time.

IMO, suing the NFL for suffering concussions you know are bound to happen is like suing the gov't because your loved one was killed while fighting in a war. These players know the risks. I agree there needs to be a better "exit strategy", but there are thousands of players who go on to live productive lives. The rookie symposium shows them how to manage themselves during their career...maybe they need a retirement symposium as well.

Love the move. Let's see what he does with a QB friendly, non WC coach. He is definitely an upgrade over Thigpen.

And they weren't available in the 4th. Therefore your comment that the FO failed to address the QB position is a result of who was available, not their refusal to draft one. Huge difference.

So, by your definition, because Fitz sucks as badly as those you mentioned that's ok? That's some effed up logic. Let's play the game differently. You are a fan of those four teams. Do you trade for Fitz? Didn't think so.

Perhaps another month in the hole to think about it will help. Or am I being obtuse? So who would you have drafted this season?

Speaking of being high...

Point taken. He SHOULD be a career back up.

Exactly. Just because we can look objectively and wish we were better at a position doesn't mean we wish no success on the current player. I'd like to do better. Pure and simple.

Hating means I hate and wish no success. I want him to win a SB. I just don't think he can do it, regardless of who is around him. Do you think if you plugged Fitz into the Pats, they go to the SB last year?

I doubt you're high (note spelling), just insane. Fitz is a career backup QB.

Had I known you'd be pissed about that, I probably would have refrained. Just don't call Fitzy "Fitzgibbons", or the board will explode with every online comedian out there. With impressive results, I might add.

I knew my mom was right.

If I can paraphrase...I think dogma is saying coaches are not good film evaluators for the purpose of drafting. Obviously coaches are great game film evaluators. Just drawing from personal experience. See above.

That's ok....you already have my scouting, coaching and GM experience noted. My first overall status is not relevant to personnel decisions.

I agree. Won't miss him a bit. The pass rush was not responsible for poor angles and missed tackles. Obviously the Bills' management agrees, or he'd still be on the damn team.

Honestly will not miss him. He was horrendous in the Giants game and, along with Fitz's two underthrows, cost us the game.

Starting QB, hands down. I hope he proves me wrong by showing it's not a need position because the building blocks throughout the team are there for Fitz to be successful. This is a make or break year for him.