Bronc24

It talked about ecstasy as a possible drug, not pot. They're not even close to being the same thing.

Hey, I hope you're right. But for every pass to Stevie in the Steelers game, there's two INTs in the Giants game (before any injury).

When he shows me this alleged arm strength in games, I will drink the kool aid. Until then, I will remain somewhat skeptical.

But what if he is bartering advice for some steaks? Who is the capitalist here? And who gets the best deal?

I'll give you that one...but recruiting high school kids and free agents are apple and oranges. He is part of a bigger team here...he was the leader of the team at Pitt and his face was the face of the program.

Useless thread, IMO....The 'Stache isn't a head coach, has no GM duties and doesn't need to recruit, so why worry? Let him do what he does best. That's what the organization is doing.

Word is we're on the way to 19 - 0.

Owning in the sense of "owning"? Or just capitalizing on Tom's laborious posts? MDP owning Tom in this case is like Marvis Frazier "owning" Mike Tyson.

And if a tree falls in the forest, does anybody hear? Pencils and drawings? Wtf? And who said anything about the lumberjack owning a house? Jesus Christ you've got to be smoking some great **** because you make absolutely no sense whatsoever. You keep recycling the same crap to make your argument but your argument blows dead goats. Wow. Just wow.

Is it not a value added economy rather than a division of labor? I take a tree and sell it for ten bucks...sawmill sells plywood for thirty....etc.? You are adding value as it moves through the chain. The labor is divided because the lumberjack is not likely working in the sawmill as well. So everyone therefore has a job, earns a wage as the fruit of their labor and profit goes into the pocket of the guy who took the risk by investing his own money. Look, maybe working in a bike shop sucks, but you're acting like Kramer when he was Santa at Coleman's. If you hate capitalism so much, go share with your buddies in Cuba or North Korea.

Lol...for the sake of argument...

How does this theory ever suggest that? Because you interpret it as such? Your argument is so far reaching and absurd that it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever and is irrelevant to my post. There's no doubt people make a living off the labour of others. I've never disputed that. But you seem to equate it to slavery, which is not true at all. There's a distinction between slavery and working for a salary. Yet you continually blur the lines for the sake of your rhetoric which makes you, in the words of DC Tom, an idiot. What an effing moron. We get it. You're poor and hate the wealthy ( or employed). Wealth and evil do not walk hand in hand any more than poor and idiocy do, dumbass.

Unbelievable. Take 8 hours off to sleep and you only have 8.5 hours to yourself in a day. SLAVE!

You forgot to mention that he is a Harvard Graduate.

I'd camp out and fight for 6.

You make it sound like workers are uncompensated slaves who are performing tasks without free will. How many of the "capitalists" in North America (I am Canadian) started as workers, yet rose to positions of prominence because they actually had ambition to succeed in life? How many of those "workers" you repeatedly refer to vacation frequently, have great homes, possessions and families and live a comfortable lifestyle? You are continually painting the picture of a slave-like labour force being totally exploited by a demon capitalist elite. Last time I checked, we have freedom and opportunity to succeed. I'd say of those protesting the 1%, 99% sit on their asses all day and list "winning the lottery" at the top of their goals in life.

Something had to be done and, Cincy Kid, that does not make me a hater, though it's convenient message board speak to say so. You cannot look to a completion %, say "hey, it went up" and be satisfied with that. As any athlete will tell you, the power comes from your legs and your core. If Fitz's mechanics were often removing these areas from the equation, then it's great that they are addressing it. He threw two costly, underthrown INT's vs. the Giants in a game we should have won. I want the guy to succeed. Hell I want him to win a SB and doubt anyone who posts here thinks differently. The difference is that we can look critically at a player and hope he improves. Everyone in the country agrees with the need for improved play at the QB position for the Buffalo Bills. Take the Bills' blinders off and be objective about it. There is a lot of room for improvement and I am hoping the horrendous play in the second half of the season was injury related. However, those throws vs. the Giants came from a healthy Fitz.

Perhaps the dumbest post I've read. And that's saying something.

Actually, to say America is built on slave labour and overseas extortion is to belittle the efforts of millions who rolled up their sleeves and went to work to make America a power. However I suppose because someone wrote it, it must be true.

Eff it. I love you too.

Deleted because it responded to your unedited post. English. Language. Marauder24, on 17 May 2012 - 04:01 PM, said: Meaning? Looks like the same time to me so I am pretty sure I "wanna go with that".

Sure it's self explanatory, now that you've edited your original post, which didn't explain a thing.

I guess that would put you in the remaining 20%.

Yep...2 tackles vs. Miami in the season finale were his only stats in the last 4 games. http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/5177/aaron-maybin

+1