Jump to content

Philo

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Philo

  1. If we based everything off of that, then Trent Edwards would still be our starting QB. Nix/Gailey are evaluating the players based on how they perform in real, regular-season games. That's a much better indicator of talent and/or the drive to win in a player than how they perform in OTA's or pre-season.
  2. Great post, I completely agree.
  3. I have to agree here. I wouldn't blink an eye if we traded away Whitner or Stroud or both at this point. They have been serviceable, but at the same time I feel they are also expendable.
  4. I was excited by Nelson's contribution as well this week. Last week, not so good. If he keeps improving and learning from his mistakes he might prove to be a decent WR. All in all though, I don't think Stevie Johnson was too bad. I mean at least he is finding the endzone while Lee is no where to be found this year.
  5. Very true. I am going to be watch college football more than ever this year, since I am interested in seeing who is available outside of the "Big Three".
  6. Just based upon that highlight reel I think he looks like a solid QB. Definitely, not the flashiest QB, but one that can get it done. What stuck out to me was that he was good at throwing on the run. Also, he appears to have good pocket presence. Seems like the kind of guy we could get in the second round unless he shoots up everyone's draft boards. Honestly though, it's too early to be talking draft
  7. I noticed that too and was sort of shocked, but also very pleased. I think Fitzpatrick played his heart out and gave us everything he had yesterday. Much kudos.
  8. Fitzy let the pass to Parrish sail a bit high, but Nelson could have made a play for the ball on the second interception. All in all I was pleased with Fitzy's overall play and poise.
  9. I never said Trent was a wuss and I didn't mean to imply that he would have sat out the rest of the game if that's what you're implying, but that Trent probably would have sat out a play or two or something along those lines. Maybe it is just me but it seems to me that he can be too conscious of getting hit. I think that if Trent had more composure he has the ability to make more plays. Unfortunately, I feel like he doesn't have that composure, or perhaps lost it at some point. If Gailey can restore that Trent could be a decent QB.
  10. We need a draft like this...and soon. You are correct that we have been missing out the past few drafts, so a year where we get those high picks and get those impact players would be very beneficial. I'm not saying I want the Bills to be terrible this year for that sole purpose, but if it happens it may be just what we need.
  11. That's it right there. Trent gets shaken up too easily so he gets happy feet and ruins plays. He just doesn't appear to have any composure 95% of the time. And yes, he would have sat out if he took that hit.
  12. +1 This was a team loss. Sure, Edwards could have played a hell of a lot better, but so could have the O-line and the backs and just about everyone else. I am as fed up with Trent as the next poster, but I really hope we can get past the whole "it's always his fault" argument. There are still a lot of things that this team needs to work on, not just QB. This is going to be a long season, but I think we all knew that.
  13. Okay, well put me on the record as saying I wouldn't mind it if it somehow worked out.
  14. He worked his ass off to get in the game at UConn as a walk on. When he finally got his chance he exploded. Easly has the drive and natural ability to be a big time receiver. Like I said, with a little luck and some good coaching he could be a great wide receiver. I don't see how that's hard to grasp.
  15. It's sad but true. I still would like to see Nix find a veteran LT this off season at least. We were reported to be in the market for Gaither, correct?
  16. I agree with the above poster that if we start with Trent and he begins to regress again, we need to play Brohm since we already know what we have in Fitzpatrick. That was something that really bugged me last season, but I understand that Fewell was going with the best option for him to get the job.
  17. Good modifications. Especially the bold part
  18. Damn straight, brother. +1000
  19. That's a little drastic.
  20. There are a lot of variables this year and a lot of things could happen, including somehow sneaking into the playoffs.
  21. I agree its possible but I wouldn't count on 11-5. 9-7 is more likely IMO if we were to sneak into the playoffs, but who knows? I know I'm excited to see it all play out
  22. I agree. Fitz probably won't get any better. Trent has some upside especially with a new coach but not as much as Brohm. He does have all the tools to be a NFL caliber QB but so far hasn't put it together. Hopefully after a full off-season with a real offensive coach like Gailey at the helm he can turn it on. Personally, I am still up in the air on who will be the starter day 1. I think its pretty even between Edwards and Brohm. Fitzy is going to take a backseat this year and just be a reliable backup.
  23. Good post I agree with everything you said, especially the sentiment that this year is not a quest to return to glory but to develop the youth and give the new staff a chance to implement their schemes. I think that is a big point a lot of fans may be missing. I am really excited to see how Gailey runs the offense, how Edwards runs the 3-4 and how our young guys play. I think this year will be more fun to watch if anything.
  24. I always noticed the zone blocking tidbit, which gives me some hope, but he is still a practice squad guy in my mind for this year at least. And I totally agree with your subtle message by the way.
×
×
  • Create New...