Jump to content

JPS

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,739
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JPS

  1. No.I'm not watching film. I want to wallow in my ignorance and get pissed cuz I wanted someone that anyone has heard of. Someone tell Buddy and Chan the War is over and they do play football in the North and West. I mean, seriously. We can justify the pick because we like Buddy, but not 1 of the gazillion or so members of the media and draft experts mention this guy as more than a camp body. I hope I just don't know. I hope I'm ignorant. Bob Massie. Russell Wilson. Was Cousins still out there? That scout has some giant cajones.
  2. BTW-I have never used the search function to find an appropriate thread. If it's not on page 1, I assume it's passed the current stream of thought.
  3. I don't think it's a stretch to say Bflo needs a QB. Fitz led the league in interceptions and there is no decent backup. I'm thinking Osweiler or Wilson in the 3rd after grabbing Martin or Adams in the 2nd.
  4. As been said many times...Show me the baby. I don't mind the path that Buddy has taken, but if they're not knocking on the playoff door by next year, he's not doing anything for me.
  5. Let's see...stout against the run with pass rush ability... What's not to like? I just think it's almost negligent if the Bills do not take an OT.
  6. Yeah it's getting weird. Looking for an ass grab from a player who wants to take it to the next level.
  7. Rams get Martin. Ravens get Glenn. Bills get Massie.
  8. Good players, but I don't think that's true. And I'm not nearly convinced that it's a bad pick. He's long, strong and talented. Even if he's not as good as he can be, he could still be disruptive on the field and a very good player.
  9. I think they do it every year. Since they don't trade up, why would they be needed in the draft room?
  10. With the lack of depth at OT and the good depth at WR, I will be SHOCKED if OT is not the pick. If there is something more than shocked, I would be that. It HAS to be an OT. Who is the smartest OT with the most starts. That's their guy.
  11. That's what I was wondering. The pick was in before they were even on the clock.
  12. That's why I'm still watching. But I'm hoping for Fleener...whi is a better add to the offense than Floyd.
  13. Corey Webster on one side...who picked off Fitz to save that game and Aaron Ross on the other. IIRC Webster was a 2 and Ross a 1.
  14. When will I listen to Nix and Gailey. One of them said when they lost CBs, they could not compete. Christ, I'm stupid. I mean...JEEEEEZ...listen!!!
  15. I may disagree with a couple players, but it's pretty well put together. My big suggestion would be that the Bills do not need 3 LBs, but really should take 1 WR in this very deep WR draft.
  16. I feel like Ben Affleck in Good Will Hunting... Gentlemen, Gentlemen, Gentlemen...you don't get it....reTAYYYYYYner.... I can't believe the amount of smoke this year. At least its interesting, I guess.
  17. Starting to think Kuechly will not be there.
  18. Is a high motor a bad thing?
  19. My friend. There were spaces in the 1st and second round and you've made picks for me while I was looking at it. The exercise got off track. I don't seeing it being worth completing. Thanks for making the attempt though.
  20. It's a BS scenario because there's NO WAY Richardson gets by Tampa, but it would actually be a best case for Buffalo in a trade out scenario.
  21. I think it's insane to consider Floyd over Blackmon.
  22. My point is: a lot of QBs can "make all the throws". A lot of QBs are 6'4". But not a lot of QBs are franchise guys. It seems like there is some healthy debate as to whether Tannehill is a franchise guy, with guys like Polian and Parcells saying he's a developmental project. BTW - Isn't Roethlisberger a lot bigger?
  23. Sounds like Rob Johnson. I could see a scenario where Tannehill falls all the way to 22. This is just more smoke.
  24. Is he more Jim Kelly or JP Losman? Big risk when Kuechly is staring you right in the face. The Bills would be laughed at for that reach.
×
×
  • Create New...