billsfan1959

I don't expect any such thing. It certainly could happen; however, I don't expect it...

I hope you liked the part where he led the team to a game winning touchdown. I thought that was pretty nice.

A. Completed over 60% of his passess Accounted for almost 300 all purpose yards Stayed calm as could be while leading the team to another 4th quarter comeback Won his 4th straight NFL start All in his 14th NFL game

Who cares what happened in 2008 and 2011. Seriously....

Add 3 wins in 3 games with two 4th quarter comebacks into that mix and you have something really intriguing brewing there...

Well come on over to the glass half full side and hang out for awhile. Really. You would enjoy it, I think - so much less angst and hand wringing than over on the glass half empty side.

I am not arguing with you. I am merely pointing out that all QBs make these same throws every game, even the great ones. For some reason, there is a segment of this fan base - not particularly you, that seem to feel that one or two bad plays like this from Allen overshadow all the good plays he maks. It's all good, brother

Always hilarious when you fall back on labeling people homers who fail to agree with you. Maybe you are just wrong. That's ok, you know. Everyboy is from time to time

Nobody is overlooking their weaknesses. Some of us just prefer to not look for ONLY the weknesses...

Right, because really good QBs never make bad decisions or throws when trying to make something out of nothing...

The past has nothing to do with this year. They are 3-0, actually a good team, and still learning. Enjoy and quit whining....

I think the Bills are a good team and certainly capabable of beating the Patriots if they do not beat themselves. You think the Patriots are Gods. Perhaps you are on the wrong message board?

Well, the Patriots opponents, after today could be 0-9...what's your point?

Actually, KC doesn't even have a good defense - just nowhere near as bad as miami and arizona were over the first two weeks

Still, I love that there was absolutely no scrutiny at all on Carter's takedown of Allen - or on a number of other hits Allen has taken just in the first two games. Which, I think goes more to the point you have been making.

Carter is certainly trying to draw a flag; however, you cannot deny Ford came in and knocked him to the ground. Do I feel that penalties are distributed equitably throughout the league and for all players? No. But this was clearly something that was going to get called. Again, I don't have a problem with it.

He was definitely flopping from the Feliciano shove; however, Ford pretty much knocked him off his feet. You can see it better on the coaches film

Here is the Ford penalty. Carter gives Allen a forearm shove to the chest after he is down. Ford is the second Bill in and you can see him pointing at Carter and then levels him. I will take that penalty every time....

Actually, Anderson was fined for hitting Allen late in the chest. He wasn't flagged or fined for the hit to the back of Allen's knees. Makes it even worse now, doesn't it? Compared to the Knox penalty:

Its Deja vu all over again...

I was actually thinking that when I was writing the post. They have been just fine without Kroft so far. Using his space for another wide receiver would probably be fine as long as the current TEs stay healthy.

Since we are talking about Kiko, I'm sure the explanation went something like this:

Agreed. In a strict either or scenario it would be kind of a toss up if in (1) the Bills didn't sneak into the playoffs, but, rather, were a legitimate playoff team, and lost a good wildcard game, and (2) the Bills beat the Pats twice because they were the better team (which, in reality, would probably mean the Bills were a playoff team). Both would show real progress for this team. In the spirit of complying with the OP's question of either / or, I would choose beating the Pats twice.

I think he finds room for him on the 53 at the expense of McKenzie, Foster, or Jones...