billsfan1959

I don’t need to re-read anything. My point was exactly that:: If they don’t beat themselves they can play with NE. If you don’t believe that, fine. The truth is, you don’t know who will win on Sunday any more than I do. At least I believe in my team

Yep. Adams definitely relies on analytics and feeds that information to Belichick, so, he is lying...again Adams is also the guy that received and used the tapes in "Spygate," so, f*** him. Cheaters...

They measure it by how quickly he is able to shed his block (based on the average QB release time of 2.5 sec), penetrate the pocket (which is recalculated with the flow of the play, and closeness (physical distance) /disruption (i.e., prevention of the QB's ability to step up in the pocket) to the QB. It is really about winning his block, not necessarily a physical hit/sack; however, if he is winning his block, then the potential for those things is there.

You must be a fun guy at parties....

Don't feed the trolls...

Right. His value to Allen, Sweeney, and Knox on the field, and within the culture of the team, is immense.

They will be able to find at least one (probably more) good receiver(s) in the 2020 draft. It is a talented and deep class.

The commentators made that statement as the live play concluded. The replay, particularly from behind Allen shows that ball was nowhere close to being intercepted. I posted the video upthread. Here it is again: Watch the clip again. At the 22 second mark that ball is cleanly in Beasley's hands before the defender gets there. It is a real stretch to say that ball was nearly intercepted.

Because it is?

One hell of a coach -and takes time away from his HC responsibilities, during the game, to give a quick hernia exam. That's an A+ in my book...

He clearly hasn't heard how the Bills miraculously escaped with wins against the three worst teams of all time...

Tell Russell Wilson and the Seattle Seahawks how bad the Bengals are when they were outgained by 200 yards, had to score late, and snuck away with a 1 point win after being outplayed for most of the game. They had a bad game against the 49ers; however, they have a good front four, two good corners, and an offense that is capable of pushing the ball downfield and scoring points. And, yet, the Bills won - and they are 3-0. Why in the world do we have to look for so many reasons to put an asterisk next to it? They have a lot of room for improvement; however, they are a good team - and will only get better.

I think the days of NE being dominant in the playoffs are numbered and Mahommes will be around a long time.

14-0 at half is not being blown out in today's NFL. Had it not been for a drop by Knox at the 4, or the fumble by Yeldon, they could have been up by 21 and then it becomes a blow out - and changes the complexion of the game. Add in the awful interception by Allen in the 3rd, and a team that was absolutely dominated up to that point, was suddenly in the game. My point was that it was only their own mistakes that kept these games even close. Those are the things they need to improve on before they move to the next level. However, they do have the ability to get there.

Last I looked, they are both undefeated. You nor I have any idea which team is better rght now. That is why they actually play the games. I guess we will see who is better this weekend.

Oh look, Mr. I don't care how immoral the players for my team are... They're 3-0. We'll see what happens Sunday. Don't you have you're own message board to impart your nuggets of wisdom on?

Apparently that is all you are doing, is looking at the stats of the NE games and proclaiming them to be almost unbeatable. Try looking at the actual games. NE and Buff put up almost exactly the same numbers against the Jets. Had Buffalo not turned the ball over 4 times, ended two drives due to penalties and dropped balls, they would have blown the Jets out by halftime. The BIlls dominated the vast majority of the Giants and Bengals games - again beating themselves with turnovers, penalties, and mistakes that prevented both games from blow outs out at half time. The Bills did dominate their opponents in play. They prevented themselves from blowing all three opponents out. The whole point of my original post was to show that they are a good team, offensively, and if they do not beat themselves, they are absolutely capable of beating of the Pats*. No matter how invincible you think they are.

Actually they didn't. The Bills dominated the vast majority of both games and allowed both teams to be in the games due to their own mistakes. Both the Jets and the Bengals should have been blown out by halftime. If the Bills didn't make mistakes that (1) took away scoring opportunities and (2) directly led to opponent scoring opportunities, then it wouldn't have mattered what the other teams did. The Bills gifted the Jets and the Bengals opportunities to win games in which they were, for the most part, dominated, and the Bills still beat them. Your analysis is superficial, intellectually lazy, and nonsensical. The Jets and the Bengals didn't lose the games because they choked. They lost because they were outplayed. Simple.

I don't think you could provide a worse analysis...

The look on his face as the game ends, with the Bills ahead on the scoreboard, will be enough for me.

Disagree completely. If the Bills are even or on the + side of the turnover margin and do not beat themselves with critical drops and penalties, they are absolutely capable of beating the Pats* at home this weekend.

As far as male impersonators go, Brady is one of the all time worst. Just an observation.

Awesome!!! I have a feeling the Bills won't disappoint...it's time.

So would I

I was one who wanted DK Metcalf (not in the 1st) and was hoping he would slide to us in the 3rd. However, I have been completely surprised at how well John Brown is playing. He can run any route, has sure hands, and speed. He is actually playing far better than Metcalf: Player Team DYAR Rk DVOA Rk ▾ Passes Yards EYds TD Catch Rate Brown BUF 81 13 33.30% 12 23 246 263 1 78% Metcalf SEA 29 36 5.70% 34 19 217 173 1 47% I'm not saying I wouldn't want Metcalf on my team, because I still would. I just wouldn't have taken him before the 3rd or 4th. The two primary issues with him are very apparent so far: limited route tree and questionable hands. However, he is still producing some nice plays for Seattle. The WR crop in next years draft may be the best in a long time. I think that is where we continue to add to our offense at that position