Oh I disagree on the corruption stuff, but she was successfully painted that way and never effectively countered it. The rumor and innuendo campaign was successful and again, she was a bad candidate that I'll agree on because she was a bad campaigner.
Her policy positions were ok, but scattered, no unifying theme and no message for everyone. She less polarizing than Trump, but she misunderstood again the depth of the economic angst out there especially in the midwest. Trump figured this out in the campaign, not so sure the Indiana bailout will be a long term success 1,0000 job loss is still a 1000 job loss even if it cost 7million to keep another 1000 for how long?. The rest of the Republican field was too ideological imo in someways the same as HRC. She never pivoted effectively from going up against Bernie and just wasn't a good public speaker. Again her economic message or philosophy was not coherent, except to help out women and minorities? Leaving out men by insinuation, which is why she lost the midwest.