OldTimer1960

I don’t understand the aversion to drafting CB early.

That top of the 4th is practically a late 3rd. Trading 108 and 131 would get you about pick 96 (bottom portion of 3rd). Obviously depends on who is still available around pick 96, but at this point I’d rather have both 108 and 131.

What do you think of Jamaree Caldwell later in the draft? I haven't watched much of his game tape, but I was surprised at his quickness for his size at the Senior Bowl.

There was never a really big chance (at least in my opinion) that the Bills were seriously in on Garrett or Crosby - the deals they signed were deserved, but also too expensive cap-wise for the Bills' situation. I'm not holding my breath for a trade for a pass rusher, either - same reasoning - cap space. I expect that they will look very hard at pass rushers in round 1 and 2 - whether one that they like will be there or not is the question. Also, pass rush doesn't just depend on DE/Edges - DTs can help the pass rush as can better coverage in the secondary and timely occasional blitzes.

I didn't mean to come across as saying they should not draft a RB this year. If there is a good one sticking out in any round after the 2nd, then I have no problem with them drafting one. Good to great RBs still have value and I think the tide is shifting back to a bit more balance of pass and run on offenses instead of the ultra-pass-heavy offenses we've seen for the past few years. As defenses adjusted with faster and lighter players to deal with the passing offenses, some (notably Philly) have made the run game a big part of their offense to take advantage of those lighter defenders.

Cook is still under contract for this season - even if they don't extend him, they don't HAVE to take a RB this year. They could wait until next year's draft or possibly even franchise tag Cook next year.

I think that they know that they need to be better on defense vs both pass and vs run. They are limited cap-wise with $ for FA, so necessarily aren't making big splashes there. I think we'll see them draft a DT, DE and CB by the end of round 2 - of course it depends on who is available at their picks, but I imagine that those are their priority positions (with also a need for WR).

This level FA is what the Bills can afford under the cap. He has size to play outside and has been consistently productive, but so far hasn’t proven that he is starter level in the league. He is still young - won’t be 25 until September. There are guys in this draft that are about as old as him. Now, I’m not saying that he is likely to develop into a good starter, but he is young enough to at least be here for a few years and provide good backup production. I wonder if WR prices are up in FA in part because the the WR draft class isn’t thought of highly.

37-13 in last three years. You can be miserable because they didn’t win a Super Bowl. Me, I am enjoying having the Bills be one of the best teams in the league.

Turner is a little interesting, but seems to have done little to nothing in 4 seasons. If he would sign very inexpensively, he might be a decent backup edge. After 4 years, I would not count on a big breakout season from him. For comparison, AJ Epenesa was drafted a full round later (1 years earlier) and, though Epenesa is much maligned here as a poor draft pick by Beane, he has far outperformed Turner.

Interesting fodder and fun. My opinion is negative on Alexander at 30. My main concern is his age (will be 25 this season), so do we really know that just being physically much more mature than most he faced in the MAC and many even at the Senior Bowl wasn’t the reason he looked so good. Late 2nd, I’d be happy to get Alexander. I don’t know how Jared Ivey helps the pass rush, but I think he would help the run defense. I know that Noel has a lot of hype now, but isn’t he mainly another slot guy? The middle of the field would be very clogged up with him, Shakir, Kincaid all looking for room in there.

Just a comment on Darius Alexander - he is only a few months younger than Greg Rousseau is and Rousseau has played 4 seasons in the league. That doesn’t necessarily mean that Alexander can’t play, but he was basically a fully grown man vs often younger players in the MAC. I am not forgetting that Alexander showed well at the Senior Bowl and combine, so there is evidence that he can play with the best in college. I’m just highlighting that there should be at least a bit of caution when evaluating him.

I don’t hate Tuimoloau late in 2nd, but I would not call him a great pass rusher. When did he run a 4.62?

I would not take the 6th year player who wasn’t even a starter in the MAC until last season- at least not in the 1st round. Pick 56 would be fine, but that’s too early in my unqualified opinion. I would have to have thought hard about Walter Nolan as long as speculation about character issues checked out ok. If Nolan’s character was a concern, I’d partake Nick Scourton there.

I’ll admit that I thought that Basham would be pretty good, but I think Scourton is at worst a strong run defending end, but we’ve also seen his pass rushing skills.

I understand that point. FWIW (and my opinion isn't worth much!), I would tend to avoid Burden just because he hasn't shown an ability to really run many routes - so many catches were short. Now, as you said he may be able to improve that. My main concern though is to try to fix the D. I'd really like the draft to fall so that they can get 3 eventual good defensive starters with their first 3 picks - I think that is possible in this draft. They NEED DT help desperately and really could use help at DE as well. They also NEED help at CB. I'm not opposed to drafting a WR if the value is there, but if they do that in round 1 or 2 it will almost certainly leave at least one gaping hole on the D at either DT, DE or CB.

I think I understand your point, but what makes Luther Burden have a higher upside? When I watch Burden, I don’t fully understand the hype. I would much rather have a defensive player at 30 than WR because I think the defensive players will be better prospects. Still, I think the idea that a good solid starting player is somehow a letdown/failure at pick 30 is not realistic.

What are you expecting at pick 30 in a middling draft? Late in round 1 I would be fine with a solid pro who will be worthy of a 2nd contract.

Ouch!

Yep - 64 and 5 weeks off knee replacement - I should be ready for camp!

I think it’s age discrimination!

Does being an older draft eligible player affect their draft position in your view? In my eyes I think it should be at least a bit of a negative. My reasoning is that 1. An older player may have a physical/mental advantage vs younger college players that makes them appear better than they really are, 2. Older draftees may have less upside as they’ve had longer to build muscle and learn their position and techniques, and 3. those older draftees will be near 30 when their rookie contract is up - so do you want a second contract for a guy near 30 y.o.? To me it is a bit like RBs being downgraded because wear and tear leads you to not want to sign them to a second contract. Darius Alexander has done a good job of hiding his birthday, but he will be a 25 y.o. rookie. Darien Porter is also a 6th year player who will be at least 24 as a rookie. Thoghts?

I really hope so and that Buffalo is the one to do the deal. I’m hard-pressed to think that there will be someone that the Bills rate so far above the other available players at 30 that they won’t consider a trade out.

I will probably get some heat for this take, but I keep reading that the DE group (and DT) in this draft is very deep. I guess looking at it there are a fair number of DEs who could be decent starters, but after Carter, Pearce, Green and maybe Ezeirauku I think many of the “starting caliber” DEs are more good run defenders who may register 5-8 sacks per year. I get that Shemar Stewart has the potential to be a big sack guy, but he hasn’t done it yet - same with Mykel Williams. I do think that Scourton and maybe Umanmielen have potential to be good sack producers, however after that it looks like “solid” “balanced” DEs like Jackson, Sawyer, Tuimoloau, Ivey and Burch. To be clear, there isn’t anything wrong with having a solid run defender that might scrape together 5-8 sacks per year- those guys have value. I guess I am just preemptively arguing that our expectations for a DE that the Bills might be able to draft should be more in the solid vs “dominant pass rusher” category. I would be happy to be wrong on this. Who else do you see in the draft at DE that might make it to 30 or 56/62 that have plus pass rusher potential? Note, I recognize that DTs can also generate pass rush pressure and it is possible that the best way for the Bills to help their pass rush may be to add a good DT - even a big plugger at DT might draw enough attention to help free up the DEs. Thoughts?

I suppose it depends on who is there, but they are moving up 6 spots and dropping 41 spots- pick 56 is still in where they may find good players, 97 is a lot more questionable. I would be more inclined to drop out of the first - still within top 40 and maybe pick up an extra 3rd or 4th. it’s not that I’m especially interested in an extra 3rd/4th, but I think you can get a very similar player at 40 as you can 30 in this draft.