Jump to content

CardinalScotts

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,914
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CardinalScotts

  1. Rivers thought their safeties were pretty good, isnt that odd
  2. only problem is we have no idea
  3. again we missed the most important numbers about maybin 2 and 1 his age 21. He's been a diappointment to say the least but way to young to cut him
  4. Dude stinks several really really good pieces on both sides of the ball can cover a couple below average guys
  5. Ya thanks for the buck thirty two picks- two fumbles one a safety. Turn around and hand off big guy we have a good team just don't get in the way again
  6. snoozefest- sorta a weird year not a lot of great teams -just paper tigers, former great teams now old and need to reload. Patriots a bit a fraud with a toothless pass defense all year..Jets - good team without a good quarterback despite 2 number one receivers, a good tightend- very good line with solid running game smoothering defense etc. missing the one piece although certain o-lineman are getting old. Ravens very much like the jets but the defense is getting old fast....Colts much like the Patriots in need of some younger players on both sides....Chiefs nice story very weak schedule in a poor div- tough schedule next year and Steelers who are solid but not great by any means get to go due to well there is nobody else. In the AFC just seems odd no younger teams ready to strike and the Pats and Colts and even Ravens are getting older. NFC some fakes like Falcons of course not only 7-9 Seattle but in a pathetic division. Bears like Chiefs nice story but a product of a weak schedule. Packers are a team that looks a year away but due to lack of descent teams guess what, your in there. Tampa might be the one up and coming team along with the Packers who could be good for a while. Gives everyone hope knowing those playoff spots for 2011 are hardly nailed down
  7. you can do this with everyteam in the league
  8. this sums it up http://www.suntimes.com/sports/football/bears/3388626-419/bears-smith-critics-season-lovie.html
  9. Mangini thinks he can be a head coach again without going the coordinator route - i disagree but he's kind of arrogant
  10. do I get his defense too ? If it's just the players Fitz is a lot better than Sanchez not really very close but if I get the Jets defense with him I'll take Sanchez or any other NFL QB that comes with the Jets D and that O-line.
  11. I've come to realize I hate every other team except for the Bills. Glad to see the Pats out but it was the Jets who did it. Can't stand Flacco but hated steelers booted them. NFC sucks this year Bears and Packers both stink. Ben with three rings is disgusting but can't root for the Jets guess it's Packers all the way. YUK ! - As long as your Franchise QB's have a smoothering defense then yes you need a franchise QB to win. However if they don't have the smoothering d - they are out in a hurry and at home.
  12. this is the kind of game you change quarterbacks over going forward. Would not shock me if they brought in mcnabb
  13. hate them both- but Jets are not even close to Pats. The AFC has Balt- Pitt and NE the other three playoff teams were barely average at best. Patriots in a walk this week
  14. come on - if we have learned one thing about Nix it's that you can not read him. Draft picks to his head coach selection -we have no idea and neither do the so called experts. Makes it frustrating but they are doing a good job so far.
  15. RIGHT - just the way Daniel Snyder does it !!
  16. they are all part time role players...hell mcgahee is three deep with the ravens !
  17. This offense is not a west coach crossing patern dump it off high completion percentage offense. If Fitz is "around" 59-62 % he's fine. The email about needed 10 more completions really sums it up
  18. my college coach put it this way "Stats are for losers" you can slant things to look good bad or what ever way you want
  19. If you took the DC position with the players we have and were required to change to a 3-4 without the players to do it, which the head coach finally realized about week four allowed then to go to a 4-3. Still no players on defense that is not your fault, no pass rush, no LB's etc. Then after one year your told your out because our players are good enough (which is essentially what you would be saying) who would want to fill those shoes. You don't just keep switching coordinators every year - there is NO reason he should be fired. Was I upset with him - yes in a way but I'm asking for marginal players (Pos, Kelsay, Whitner) to make plays for us because we have no one else. Also the LB's we ran out there were comical, this year wasn't as much about the X's and O's than the Jimmy and Joes.
  20. yeah kindaa a push ....Pats are waiting so doesn't matter
  21. then why did they smell in a terrible division they played 4 playoff teams one of them 7-9 seattle
  22. agree but you also have to figure in Fitz ability to run and toughness- I trade a few % points for a guy who can take a hit and can run
  23. Because Willie Parker was unknown doesn't mean he stunk actually he was pretty good as it turned out
  24. Because we have no players on defense....could easily replace all the d-line man with the exception of Williams...all the line backers...one safety and no lock down corners. What do you expect without a pass rush or the players to do it. We do have some young promising players in Troup-Carrington-Byrd even McKelvin but the LB situation is among the worst in the league can't cover, can't rush the passer and aren't very good tacklers as well. 42.5 total his last 4 full seasons....yeah he stunk.
×
×
  • Create New...