One might think ptr would want a shred of evidence before making multiple posts about it being the refs interfering
but maybe I’m wrong about the bar he can clear
Ive been on board with hoping this is the end of the road if they win. Plus, doc already said he’s quittung the nfl if they do.
the best of course being they traded jimmy like 2 months before brady retired if it happens...
Yup- and the second place vote getter lost his starting rb and qb and still got the NFCCG.
mcVay was the big culture change vote and Zim was the overachiever... I can’t fault that consensus
Bingo.
looks to be a good admin that daboll May groom long term. Realistically he’s probably two full promotions from a position coach... at this point Castillo is probably our guy barring a real curveball
Yup.
And you cant stress over a wide margin in votes. If everyone agrees he’s a little better - it looks like a blowout. If there’s a polarizing guy it looks closer even if it might not be on the field
they were both really consistent guys at the same position so it likely made it easy to find consensus. It’s not like one was boom and bust or anything. Just an excellent player and a little better for the other. I’d bet tre would’ve gotten rated relatively close if they could give scores to each player instead of just picking a winner.
He’d be silly to slam the door.
I still think the dream spot for him would be wr2 in New Orleans. 2 year deal to match what I expect for brees.
Great qb, aggressive offensive scheme. Should get numbers and exposure and be young enough for 1 big deal after.
The flip side—
1) we did not go all in on this year, so youth has some added value
2) we got lucky that shady didn’t miss time as the drop off would’ve been even more substantial
3) did the vikes succeed by relying on a single explosive player or incredible depth?
im not arguing it as an obvious choice- just saying it’s probably more debatable than some think
Pick 31 and opening a bunch of cap space and getting young?
Let’s say it was last offseason — and maybe not even a first rounder. Would we be better off with shady and Tolbert or something like the Vikings backfield that has depth to handle losing their #1?
Say a rookie like cook/Kamara/hunt paired with Murray and another mid tier back? There are arguments to be made.
I think his point was that he shouldn’t have stretched it to 20
i think his point ignores the nature of human beings having a conversation and how you sometimes throw out reasonable estimates instead of getting super firm in your details.