Jump to content

NoSaint

Community Member
  • Posts

    42,097
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NoSaint

  1. That OLB comment really meshes with what I was saying. Not an immediate Edmonds replacement
  2. counter: I don’t expect them to think he’s a day 1 starter so it’s maybe not the same need based pick you think.
  3. which scout was that?
  4. meh, similar physical measurables don’t mean the same play. One could pick up the scheme wonderfully and grow in it while the other struggles. They both have question marks but we now have two swings at it instead of one and that’s better odds.
  5. Good kid, really enjoyable team, fast and solid tackler, not an elite size or he would have been higher. you aren’t penciling pick 91 to be a day 1 guy but will compete for opportunities
  6. I’m going pure memory but kromer worked wonders with massive day 3 pick Carl nicks in New Orleans. similar size. I cant claim to recall his 3 cone or arm length measurables coming out but huge guy with 1 year of premium competition. Saints were also a team with a big screen game. You don’t have to get 40 yards downfield to sell a block and disrupt a guy in pursuit. Especially if you have Davis, Knox and Kincaid in there for the second level.
  7. and kromer coached well with Roman. I think there’s some questions, but they did a lot of work on this one so I imagine it wasn’t a knee jerk surprise they hadn’t thoroughly considered until the guy slipped to them
  8. that’s quite the development, Einstein. Than you for sharing this news. We are lucky to have your smarts
  9. what exactly have you looked for with him? it’s easier to just say you don’t know him but didn’t like last years line. he was good last stint, and was great with the saints. See his development of Carl nicks and jahri evans as guard projects that became all pros.
  10. I think that’s the assumption
  11. he’s also been an elite coach for a loooong time
  12. he took several steps in any direction? That’s more than some here advertise him capable of Could be Cody ford, could be great. Glad we took a viable swing.
  13. Almost like i said “more of a” yea aren’t getting a wart free all pro that does everything well at 59 they got a guy that wins at point of attack but isn’t as mobile. For a position that needs less, but not zero, mobility. they are all coin flips at this point. Hopefully he mauls a few guys.
  14. At least interior where he can be more of a phone booth guy. I bet Josh will sneak to his side more often
  15. Or perhaps bench as a swing backup
  16. Quicker to type the patriots and chiefs went to the Super Bowl a lot
  17. and be great chipping ends off the line and while he won’t heads up move a DE back in the run game regularly they aren’t going to collapse him regularly either
  18. bingo- he may not be the super physical mauler but he’s certainly a more capable blocker than beas or lil dirty, and he can build that part of his game up while still contributing
  19. that’s way different than adding an aging all pro though. a day 2 or 3 rookie to replace Davis next year is a different dynamic
  20. I think it’s unlikely now but neither diggs nor Davis play 100% of snaps. 3 guys splitting 2 roles isn’t crazy when fully healthy yet alone once there are tweaked ankles or hamstrings. that said, given our crowded room I’m not sure it’s great value unless you are 100% all in on this year at all costs and sort the rest out later. Which I’m not opposed to.
  21. except, not the same skill set
  22. but I’ll keep stressing that Knox is paid like Zay Jones, not like a big time pass catcher. The number feels big but it’s tweener dollars for tweener play. Good not great in the passing game. Solid but not crushing blocker. and paid like an ok blocker or catcher
  23. knox is paid like a modest pass catcher - it’s not a game breaking deal.
  24. Again, think replacement for McKenzie not replacement for Knox
×
×
  • Create New...