I think you're confusing the results with the actual play calling. The result was the same but Gailey tried so many different plans, formations, plays that I don't see how you could confuse yesterday's plan with Jauron's. Jauron's problem was playing too conservative, while Gailey's was maybe the opposite.
Jauron would stick with the same plan even if it never worked, while I think Gailey could have stood to stand by a game plan longer. The Wildcat was moderately effective yet he never went back to it. He just never could establish one game plan.