TH3

Right on cue. The nutbag RIGHT wants you to know this isn't about terrorism. It's about DEMOCRATS. If there were no POLITICS, this would have been avoided. It's amazing to me how much dumbassery comes out of the RIGHT when a tragedy like this hits. Will the RIGHT be praying for the victims and families, or will they run another Daily News headline explaining that God isn't going to fix this...and that only the GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS can make this right?

The poster asked how it was possible that one man could kill 50 people on his own - I responded with the technology and the availability - just facts...and right on cue YOU are the one adding spin - I know you have trouble with simple facts and simple answers. See above

Semi automatic weapons with big clips available at your local gunshow....

Sorry to break this news to you - They are already ALL regulated - not my opinion - just they way it is. Second amendment rights have not changed in the last 8 years. Invasion of privacy? I believe that started with Bush 43 Loss of religious freedoms - What religious freedoms have you lost in the last 8 years and expect to lose under HC? The LS don't want to sign a piece of paper - and that is relevant to you personally how? The IRS stopped you from assembling - when was that? I missed that party? How - when... sharpshooter? Civil assets - BO did that? HC is running on a platform of that? What - gay people marrying - affects you personally how? Give it up marksman....the world aint that bad....

OK sniper - tell me your specifc tales of woe of how your freedoms have changed over the last 8 years.... Well - What HC says is correct...until the Scalia decision it was up to the states or localities...and in fact there were local regulations on firearms...it ain't why I "think" or "agree with" bro.....of course there are regulations on "rights"....check free speech for one, there already are regulations on firearms....got an automatic? of course it is just so much FUN to fight your imagined war against the government...... Please - give me one example of how your "freedoms" have changed over the last 8 years....

That one sure stings..a lot...I bet you hate have having fuel efficient cars with a crap-ton of horsepower too..... Stripped of illegal search and seizure? Well that was 43 - who you likely voted for. 5th amendment ? Brought down to the hooskow and had to testify against yourself lately...? Weak...on the other hand you can marry your gay lover if you want, and bring your gun to the wedding as your 2nd amendment rights were reaffirmed in what 2008? ...and you and your rich corporate buddies can contribute as much money to political causes as you want because that spreads freedom like nothing else....

I hear this all the time....what freedoms have you lost in the last 8 years....and if HC is POTUS - what freedoms do you expect to lose?

So why isnt Trump talking about them?

Pretty sure that the police force in Ferguson was predominantly white and was shown to treat black people much different that white people... http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/02/us/justice-department-report-to-fault-police-in-ferguson.html?_r=0 Pretty sure your position is off...at the least....

Payback for what? The hot mess of 2016 with all the gays married and T people peeing who knows where and none of our troops coming home in boxes and a relatively good economy or the hot mess of 2008 where we were in 2 unfounded wars, our economy was in free fall, unemployment was 10 percent plus, the auto industry was bankrupt? Payback for millions LESS iillegal immagrants than the Bush years, a lower yearly deficit? You say it is not rational....do you mean that this "payback" is an unfounded concept?

No the Trump phenomenon is a result of the hot mess that is the GOP

proof of idiocy...well done

And yet he got the nomination...pretty much showing that there does not exist an organized GOP right now...not sure T campaign is based on racism...but it is ludicrous

Whelp - Seeing as the nature of this thread is that the messengers of the Theory of Global Warming are wrong - not because of the maths - but because they are not credible because they are self serving money grabbers and they want government to take over and redistribute wealth....and to augment this "discredit the messenger" positon that this thread is built on...the poster augments it with an article that is not written by scientists or experts in the field...but by lawyers... So there is that....

Article written by a bunch of lawyers for the American Enterprise Institute?

So - Since Hillary's husband was a !@#...the saws off Donald's past with women, divorces, misogynistic comments? Gotcha

DooD....NO ONE is saying this - only the conservatives who are projecting.....carry on......

1. So you are against local rule huh? 2. This has nothing to do with integrated bathrooms. 3. Chances are - T people have been going to whatever bathroom unnoticed for years - can you cite a complaint? Ever? Kinda like voter fraud.... Prejudice - I have prejudged? Let's see - state with history of slavery and bigotry against rights of blacks, gays and trans people.... Nah...pretty sure its just a bunch of angry white bible thumpers clinging and trying to pick a last fight.....with someone they see as less perfect than themselves....how historical....

Likening a spat over biologically segregated boy/girl bathrooms to the genuine, violent, systematic, state-sponsored, society-wide bigotry that took place in this country for a century is both intellectually and morally corrupt. It’s not all a continuum. Yet this administration peddles these kinds of risible comparisons in the cause of self-aggrandizement all the time. Hans Fiene has coined it Selma envy. . Puhlease - This law was nothing more than a bunch of people whose time has past grasping at the last straw...and now loving that the Feds got involved...and if you and your conservative beat writers don't see it as much you are simply blind...

Nothing adds credibility and depth to a point of view better than the confederate flag

^^

GDP growth will reflect the income gains from the middle class - almost exactly. The 2000-2006 boom was based largely on the middle class over leveraging to compensate for lack of wage growth. At this point any upticks in GDP from "trickle down" are done. The well off have everything they need - other than driving up the price of collector cars. Money has collected at banks, corporations and real estate in a holding pattern - very few good places to invest in barring demand growth.

You should switch to a different yet as completely unbelievable website that carries good news....

FWIW - Somewhat distant family member scout for NFL team - saw him last week - HATES Lynch