TH3

"I don't know......". but I will be sure to throw my ignorant prejudged opinion at it!

So the GOP lets a Dem Senator from decades ago make the rules?

"Trump" curently has about 20 employees

So Trump tells the truth? Guy lies every time he speaks....and i don't like Hillary at all...

CONGRATULATIONS!! You managed to crack out a canned answer....next the the BN is going to hire you for a "PowerTake" column!!! Do a little homework.

there are people who actually think Bernie Sanders, a socialist, an win a general election in a conservative leaning country Silent majority must be.... 40 percent think of themselves as conservatives 57 moderate/liberal

The problem is ...people believe this warped vision....

No - what threats exist...no just hype...REAL threats...that you see that would fundamentally change the ability of law abiding citizens to own firearms? Any legislation on the horizon - any that exist? The below is going to change? District of Columbia v. Heller, the 2008 decision....the Supreme Court held that the Constitution protects an “individual” right to keep and bear a handgun for purposes of self-defense.

What threats to the 2A are there?

Huh....Trump must have changed his views on single payer health care, same sex marriage, and abortion.....

Truth hurts huh?

So pointing out an obviously incorrect statement is racist.....got it.....

"Punch him in the face...I will pay the legal bills"......?

That was the Bush years.... I would say the number one inhibitor on current economic growth is poor distribution of the wealth that is being created.

BO so divisive that he won two general elections - 2012 with a 50 percent plus majority... DT has - what 35 percent of 30 percent...which gives him...10.5 percent...

Ya but guys like Azalin or J6pack who would see there HC improve dramatically in cost and benefit would be totally against it...

You can read

Why don't you guys just drop the facade and come out and say it....you think BO is just a niqqer and wasn't your President....feel the hate...feels good doesn't it

The party of personal responsibility steps up strong again....

Either of you guys black?

You mean the party guys/varsity letter winners from high school who couldn't get a real job - whose real skill is knowing a lot of people to rope in as opposed to actually understanding the economy?

SS doesn't work - its a con.

The aspect I liked about NR was her insistance the RR be remembered as ​pragmatic conservative. RR said it was better to have half a loaf rather than none and James Baker and Tip O'Neil negotiated quite a bit of legislation. RR was a compromiser and worked across the aisle. NR did not like her husband being remembered as a conservative demagogue - because he wasn't.

So - we have two plans - the Trump plan - which is basically exactly what we had before the ACA with some tax breaks and state line tweaks? Employer funded HC for most, those w/o HC left to try to buy insurance on their own? Since Trump doesn't specifically say this - I am trying to pin down what he is proposing. If so - do you think what Trump proposes is the best we can do? The post ACA and pre ACA health care funding and provision model is simply, patently, inarguably, the WORST way to address HC there is. There is almost nothing efficient or business friendly about it. The metrics bear it out...it is the most expensive with the poorest performance for the dollar in the civilized world - and hampers business and mobility. If Trump thinks all it needs is those bullet points - that is tremendously disappointing for a candidate to run this country. I also find it sad that the first 10 comments from the OP didn't pick up on how shallow it was. Wonder why you guys hate the people in office.

Private insurance is bad, but private healthcare providers good? There is a difference = Insurance has no incentive to reduce costs - just get more billing. The reimbursement is a lump sum - therefore the HCP goal is to reduce costs to make margin on that lump sum. Who said Canada has free health care? I said a car built in Canada and sold in USA has very little HC costs built into it as it is exported. So is this just the pre ACA HC structure tweaked? The ACA didn't change the basic structure of HC in the USA. Please tell me how risk is profiled and spread. Do employers still provide for most people, all people, all people at a certain salary level? How do individuals bargain as compared to pooled risk? How do you cover preexisting conditions? How do you cover the poor, the old? How do you spread the varied risk of a lifetime individually? People without insurance left to die - or do we pick up the costs in the ER? Does the Trump plan help our businesses compete internationally?