TH3

Pence

LOL. this dude baskin has the highest ratio of arrogance to ignorance on this forum. that's saying something.he probably thinks Bernie is an example of neoliberal At least you didnt call me a liberal! This board loves to label...especially when bad outcomes can somehow be tagged "liberal"... Or neo liberal for what its worth. The "NL" policy free trade etc was championed by the conservative right with the afterthought that those displaced would mythically be brought up with trickle down economics. It is now somwhat ironic that - at least here in the US - that the GOP nominee is being championed by displaced GOP voters to rectify their displacement.... will need "liberal" type policies to fix.....

I think you are more than a little quck to label the concept of free trade as "neo liberal". This board always so anxious to label and pick sides. Free trade hardly what "liberals" pushed. That being said ...ignoring those displaced by trade policies is the issue here and Pat Buchanon is correct to call out the economists who ignore this. Not everyone is going to go to college and write code.......

I believe you are mixing your want and need to call this terrorism in a little too much....as usual....glossing over the details and layers to suit your agenda

Don't you understand - on this board if you criticize the right you are by default a liberal... Or - the 40 percent of the US who could not get over having a black president divided it.....

TOTALLY AGREE...freedoms have costs and side effects - free speech leads to phucktards like Rachel Maddow and others...likewise the highest gun violence rate in the free world is simply the cost of freedom that we are willing to live with....

Always with the name calling here...

You need to give it up too....

Give it up.

What should BO have done? (BTW - he didn't move any businesses out of NC)

Well this case has it all: American citizen born and bred Second Amendment guaranteed him access to guns FBI surveilled him but could not do anything further without illegal search You say - liberals are blaming ourselves and our freedoms for creating this person.....well this guy was a US citizen born and bred - are you suggesting that some US citizens should not be granted the same rights as others? How are you going to pick out the US citizen terrorists who don't deserve these rights?

He was on his way to Make America Great Again....

So your point is I mentioned gun shows...? Predictability of MY ideologies? Wha? Someone asked how technically one person could inflict such damage - I say semi auto with a large clip (I guess I should have said magazine). Then multiple posters PREDICTABLY take that and parse it into left/right conservative/progressive missives and mix in some religious spice for good measure. You guys are comically pathetic.

You do realize that LA was injecting the ole left/right points in a response to my post and so I simply changed a couple of words to his reply to show how simple its is to show the hypocrisy on this board I didn't rush to my corner - at all - you guys did

nothing got my goat up - thin skinned much? Some one asked a question and I answered - thank you for adding data that the gunman could obtain the necessary weapons via a regular gun store too..

Right on cue. The nutbag RIGHT wants you to know this isn't about terrorism. It's about DEMOCRATS. If there were no POLITICS, this would have been avoided. It's amazing to me how much dumbassery comes out of the RIGHT when a tragedy like this hits. Will the RIGHT be praying for the victims and families, or will they run another Daily News headline explaining that God isn't going to fix this...and that only the GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS can make this right?

The poster asked how it was possible that one man could kill 50 people on his own - I responded with the technology and the availability - just facts...and right on cue YOU are the one adding spin - I know you have trouble with simple facts and simple answers. See above

Semi automatic weapons with big clips available at your local gunshow....

Sorry to break this news to you - They are already ALL regulated - not my opinion - just they way it is. Second amendment rights have not changed in the last 8 years. Invasion of privacy? I believe that started with Bush 43 Loss of religious freedoms - What religious freedoms have you lost in the last 8 years and expect to lose under HC? The LS don't want to sign a piece of paper - and that is relevant to you personally how? The IRS stopped you from assembling - when was that? I missed that party? How - when... sharpshooter? Civil assets - BO did that? HC is running on a platform of that? What - gay people marrying - affects you personally how? Give it up marksman....the world aint that bad....

OK sniper - tell me your specifc tales of woe of how your freedoms have changed over the last 8 years.... Well - What HC says is correct...until the Scalia decision it was up to the states or localities...and in fact there were local regulations on firearms...it ain't why I "think" or "agree with" bro.....of course there are regulations on "rights"....check free speech for one, there already are regulations on firearms....got an automatic? of course it is just so much FUN to fight your imagined war against the government...... Please - give me one example of how your "freedoms" have changed over the last 8 years....

That one sure stings..a lot...I bet you hate have having fuel efficient cars with a crap-ton of horsepower too..... Stripped of illegal search and seizure? Well that was 43 - who you likely voted for. 5th amendment ? Brought down to the hooskow and had to testify against yourself lately...? Weak...on the other hand you can marry your gay lover if you want, and bring your gun to the wedding as your 2nd amendment rights were reaffirmed in what 2008? ...and you and your rich corporate buddies can contribute as much money to political causes as you want because that spreads freedom like nothing else....

I hear this all the time....what freedoms have you lost in the last 8 years....and if HC is POTUS - what freedoms do you expect to lose?

So why isnt Trump talking about them?

Pretty sure that the police force in Ferguson was predominantly white and was shown to treat black people much different that white people... http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/02/us/justice-department-report-to-fault-police-in-ferguson.html?_r=0 Pretty sure your position is off...at the least....

Payback for what? The hot mess of 2016 with all the gays married and T people peeing who knows where and none of our troops coming home in boxes and a relatively good economy or the hot mess of 2008 where we were in 2 unfounded wars, our economy was in free fall, unemployment was 10 percent plus, the auto industry was bankrupt? Payback for millions LESS iillegal immagrants than the Bush years, a lower yearly deficit? You say it is not rational....do you mean that this "payback" is an unfounded concept?