
TH3
Community Member-
Posts
3,332 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by TH3
-
Yes ...the millenials will surely screw up what their predessors have so carefully crafted.. My college kids and their friends seem to have their heads on pretty straight...not too worried.
-
Don't blame Tyrod for loss. BUT!!!!!!!
TH3 replied to r henderson's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
He had pretty much the same game he always has. No pics and if evrything around him goes well...Bills win....if everything doesn't go well around him.Bills probably lose....he is what he is...a mediocre qb who won't lose a game for you but prbably won't win one either... -
Don't blame Tyrod for loss. BUT!!!!!!!
TH3 replied to r henderson's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I am in ....TT not going to be a guy to make things happen....heck.watching Landry Jones look like what we want TT to be -
Kaepernick and the National Anthem
TH3 replied to 26CornerBlitz's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Says the white guy.... -
Debate 3 Discussion: Back to Split screen
TH3 replied to Benjamin Franklin's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
You do realize that the biggest recent "legislative" SCOTUS actions were conservative. The Voting Rights Act and Campaign Finance reform were both bipartisan, overwhelmingly passed with near unanimous approval by both house and senate.....and Scalia saw fit to overturn them. I would say both were bad calls: The States that were under the VRA immediately went back to their nefarious ways and NC was just found to have blatantly targeting minorities in pinching voting access. Talk about Tyranny. CU has thrown gas on the pay for legislation we have today. Legislators now spend half their time raising money...Bravo Scalia...the Supreme Legislator... -
What exactly would those be? Taxes? Balancing the budget? Health Care? Education? Maybe I should just review what the bills the GOP held congress has passed in the last two years on a quick refresher on their better ideas...
-
I had a lot of friends who went to Bona's - they tend to have jobs with a lot extra time - and from what I remember - besides stopping at the boat and halfway houses and hickey's tavern - was that they were pretty good at cutting and pasting...
-
Yeesh - rather than the histrionics (pretty sure HRC won't start the baby killing in the first term) - why not do this: Go back to the last 10-20 years and look at the bigger Scotus decisions: Same Sex marriage, voting, campaign finance, probably some worker v. business stuff. Some went conservative and some went liberal. Now that they are the rear view mirror - see what the ramifications of those decisions are and see whether liberal or conservative decisions led to better results. Here is the part about abortion I don't get: The "conservatives" have had the court for - what - 30+ years at least - Why did they not overturn Roe V Wade while they held the court?
-
Be nice if you comment on what I said. To answer your question I would say this is my observation: Things are a compromise - right - finding a balance. Supply side in my mind refers to the approach our government has taken since Reagan - Which is what is good for the money markets, good for big business, and good for the wealthy is good for the nation and this tide will raise all boats. Tax policy is just one component of this. We have loosened credit markets, loosened regulation on Wall Street, created Nafta and China trade agreements to help our big corporations compete. The "supply side" has done tremendously well for the last 40 years. The wealthy have gotten super wealthy, big corporations have done well, and the money industry has also done exceedingly well. This also has the collateral effect of improving much of the population of the US. I am probably one of those - life has been good to me catching the wave of the supply side. But for large swaths of America - "supply side" has left them in the dust. The trade agreements left them without a job or with a diminished job and cutting taxes doesn't help them at all. To me - this is the attractiveness of Trump - he is right - it is rigged - for the corporate, the wealthy and the powerful. legislation is written by them for them - supply side runs the country. Supply side doesn't give a hoot about those who have not benefitted from this policy - trust me. What kills me is Trumps economic policy is pretty much nothing but more supply side - and those who haven't benefitted from SS policies still love Trumpt - because he is a change agent. So to answer your question: Low taxes is just one element of "supply side" that exacerbates the wealth gap. The evidence is in - we live in it. The answer? I think guys like Robert Raich (who I am pretty sure most people here hate) has a simple proposition - take some of the benefits from supply side and use them to the people who have not benefitted from this policy = whether this be job training, child care, start up capital, college education....
-
The historical and empirical results are in - we live in a supply side low federal tax economy - have for 40 years - do you like the results? Like the balanced budget? Like the wealth divide? AFA the Estate Tax - I am guessing that most people on this board would not be affected by a change in the estate tax - other than if T's proposal went through - you guys would be required to pay more taxes and would be willing to cede more power and control to those more wealthy than you....
-
Seriously dude...posting links to blatantly biased sources is weak sauce...grow your game a little bit,,,do a little R and D....form your own opinions....
-
Says the guy who links nothing but right wing websites
-
McCoy asks Bills fans to be respectful of Kaepernick
TH3 replied to Yeezus's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Says the self proclaimed smartest man in the room....what have you done to earn anyones respect? -
Generalize much? You don't even know me - and when I give you some background on my professional and educational background - you scoff at my successes... Not sure how I am a liberal - I voted "liberal" once in my life - and almost always cons/GOP....the point that you say I don't think for myself is laughable.... If people on the right hand principles - Trump would get almost no votes....let alone be nominated.... Carry on...
-
You are completely correct - I come here for the laughs - nothing else - this board is like a view into the great expanse of misinformed but confident - I find it oddly compelling to drop by once in a while. You are right - I do not have the time or motivation to be keep up with you.
-
I need to get my post count up to 33k like you so i can get better at eliminating tpyos
-
Perhaps you could...on your own...reference some recent conservative Scotus decisions and how the have led to greater benefit to society and likewise some liberal leaning decisions and how they left us orse...
-
They did not F up....this is the culmination of 30 years of Rush Fox Coulter Jones...Electing Bush, Palin....never balancing the budget, chasing idiotic social issues....never shrinking the govt....This is your GOP....The GOP Is its voting base....
-
"They" would be the overwhelmimg majority of GOP voters.... And check the rules on what happens if he drops out....doesnt just go to Pence
-
Are you talking about Trump?
-
So this guy - instead of examining the specific causes of each recession and the specifics of each response - looks at a graphs and says - Hey the recovery isn't as steep as the downturn - Thanks Obama!! Got it.... So GROWTH has slowed.... still growth.... Seriously - what other country would you rather live in? ....If you spent your time trying to get better at your occupation, trying to start something, trying to create something maybe you wouldn't be such a whiny B word constantly complaining about BO and posting links When you got up this morning name ONE THING preventing you from becoming rich/successful/happy?
-
No. It won't.
-
Global warming err Climate change HOAX
TH3 replied to Very wide right's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
So....Global Warming is a hoax because math is math and you can't argue with it and your math to discredit Global Warming is......politics in the US House? -
Oh. I am sure you will say something
-
Trying to eradicate the 2nd....you know how that works right? Oooh. I forgot....releasing actual info is worse.....gotcha