loedward22

It's pessimism. I'm naturally pessimistic and recognize when I'm having pessimistic thoughts and still can't do anything to stop it...

I understand that being the case live, but once something has been called an interception and they have to review it, then it seems to me like the standard has changed (as it now needs to be conclusive).... Is there any precedence for this situation and if so how was it handled?

I haven't heard this question discussed anywhere (TV, post game radio, nor on here). If they call it an interception on the field, don't they need conclusive evidence to overturn it? Therefore the problem was them calling it an interception on the field, and there not being anything conclusive to overturn it. From every angle they showed it was a fifty fifty which is the opposite of conclusive...

Good comparison... I hadn't put that together yet but you are spot on.

I don't believe that McKenzie play was broadcast either...

The GB fanbase has experienced some pretty significant success and doesn’t know pain like we know. The special thing about Buffalo’s fanbase to me is it being what it is despite arguably the most painful history.

3 game losing streak. Beat Pitt. Lost to NE, Jets, and Texans

Actually you can get it for $100 - put your location to India and it's $100. At least that was the case last year.

I actually really like "Football Team" and would stick with that. But if they have to change I'd go with the "Burgundy and Gold".

Not necessarily.. I think all of this was orchestrated after he was with the raiders.

It wouldn’t surprise me if the patriots had been telling him how to accomplish this goal all along

They kept saying during the broadcast that the Bills never went 4-0 in a pre-season. This was the first time they went 4-0, which I think is awesome because it might well have been the last opportunity (change in pre-season seems imminent)

Brown said the nickname was given to him when he was a baby and had nothing to do with him being fast.

no way. he owns the league. what will be most interesting and infuriating is how QUICKLY this get's swept under the rug.

He's correct. Should Barkley start tomorrow we would technically have had 5 starters. Those you listed and McCoy.

Peterman being on the roster at this point is unexplainable. I started to wonder if the Jesus theory was the case after Peterman remained on the roster after the Baltimore game. Another poster up above suggested another valid theory (pride). At this point I just want to know how it's possible that Peterman is on the team.

I am so happy they are finally fielding this question. I've long felt this is the case and it finally sounds like they're going to talk about it.

Schopp came back at beginning of hour 4 but made no mention of what happened (Bulldog either) I don’t think McDermott would call back... some underlying would. But I’m not saying I think this happened, just speculation as to a possible explanation.

Schopp being absent for the half hour after the interview is what I find most interesting. This interview is arranged for between the Bills and WGR. One possible explanation for Schopp's absence following the interview is that McDermott has even more power within the organization than I previously thought. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the questions they had for McDermott today. His hanging up was out of line.

I've long suspected this as the reason why McDermott drafted Peterman and why he continues to stick with him. My fear is that this is the same reason McDermott is our coach and that this mentality goes all the way to the top. I have absolutely no problem with religion, but it has no place in business decisions. The only thoughts I can come up with to comfort my fears is that Pegula is too successful to have let this been part of his decision making...

Sal needs to refine his idea. We actually have to find a high culture (ideally a holy roller) elite WR. Unfortunately these are even more rare and difficult to find.

I don't think this is as dumb as seemingly everyone is suggesting. Actually OP I would absolutely believe a team playing us would rest certain players for that game. Smart people made the argument against us getting Mack saying a player like that is great but doesn't actually lead to wins. I've heard this about Bell in Pittsburgh as well. If you have even a good player rest against us I don't think it would have a chance at changing the outcome. 17 points? That's a ridiculous spread that all but guarantees a loss.

I think it did this to a lot of us...

Okay thank you. I thought he was for sure a free agent... I guess it's just most likely he's a free agent.

I don't think he can be