section122

E ball love ya man and very happy you have an iPad but turn the f@)$&ing signature off!

I haven't posted in this thread bc I feel much the same way. Sure I could go in depth for what I feel the movie represents but most people here have already trashed 2 and 3 so they don't care to hear it. I'm not knocking anyone when I say that either. These movies were intentionally never explained by the wachoskis. They wanted people to get their own idea what they were about. I lean heavily towards the religion/spirituality yin and yang myself. If anyone is interested tell me and ill lay down my "thesis"

I don't know where else to put this but I thought you all should know.... There are officially no more Sundays for the rest of the year without football!!!

The story on Ryan was that he was a great qb at home but struggled on the road and in the playoffs. 1 win last year doesn't erase that. Would we all take him on the Bills? Of course but that doesn't mean he is worth 100 million. Think about the contracts Brady has signed. They have been reasonable and affordable allowing the team to keep and/or sign good players. This contract will hamstring the Falcons as they have to re-sign their weapons. See the Ravens this year. I'll list and you tell me where you disagree: I'd rather have: Brady Brees Rodgers Manning Manning Roethlisberger Luck Russel Wilson And put him in a group with: Kaepernick RG3 So 100 million for an end of the top 10 qb? One that has lost time and again in the playoffs? That seems crazy to me and they will pay the price for it. Unfortunately it is a qb game and he gets whatever he wants....

Did anyone else read this as coke was okay bc it got Jim into parties and Stevie's shirt isn't bc it does nothing for him? Please tell me I'm reading this wrong!

The beauty of him is that he will allow you to call in and actually let you speak your piece. Some of his points are tongue in cheek and some are idiotic. I won't speak about Sean Taylor as I didn't hear the show but I did hear the Cleveland one ( don't specifically remember him mentioning Indy). His point was if your in a situation, can better it by doing something and don't, you beat some responsibility for your situation. As for supporting your teams, can you argue that by spending money on a product you are supporting that product. If you continued to by a car from a company that broke down all the time are you sending a message that they need to improve? What other industry besides sports can let you down time and again and still get your dollars. It was another line of thinking and one that I had never considered. He doesn't have to be for everyone. I'm not trying to convince anyone. I thought the point was interesting and one that I'm sure others hasn't considered just as I hadn't. That's why I enjoy him, many times he has lines of thinking that are different than mine and is reasonable when conveying them.

I will give you the three "stunts" that cost 15 yards as they were detrimental to the team. Why so serious wasn't flagged and led to happy New Years. He didn't think it would be a penalty as it wasn't before. The others? Wearing a wife beater? Who cared about that? Oh no it showed up on c'mon man! A birthday cake that was *gasp* shaped like a butt! Seriously? This shirt? You are no longer objective on this and haven't been for quite some time. Any and every time he breathes wrong you step on your soap box. As for the first two... The kid just had his heart broken. He knows he screwed up. He knew he let his team down. In the heat of the moment he said something he regretted. Who hasn't done that? Post game performance? Here you've just had your heart ripped out on national tv - lets put a mic in front of your face. All of your list boils down to 3 offenses that he vowed (and followed through on) to not have happen again. You're crusading and this one just isn't a good one.

I'm seeing that I'm an in the minority but I enjoy cowherd immensely. He is very articulate when making his points and allows discussion when people disagree with him. Quite the opposite of Jim Rome. He follows and talks about winning teams. He has said many times over that people love to complain about him doing that but the ratings don't reflect that reality. Honestly do you think he would get better ratings talking about New England or buffalo? The Miami heat or the Milwaukee bucks? The Kansas City royals or the ny Yankees? On of my favorite takes of his is that the fans share as much blame as management when a team performs poorly for extended periods. By continuing to support an inferior product fans are telling management that they don't care about winning they care about having a team to call their own. Believe it or not he wasn't talking about the bills when he made it. He was talking about the cubs. Can't say it didn't make me think of my favorite football team though...

An employees responsibility to not have his employer use a picture of him to wish him a happy birthday. Yes Stevie wore the shirt but the bills, his employer, posted it. Apparently they have no problem with it. Nobody cares about this. Nobody in the media cares about this. Nobody in the military cares about this. Nobody on the team cares about this. Apparently nobody from the Bills cares about this. Just a few fans that already don't like Stevie and want to use any excuse (even one as poor as this) to bash him. And yes big cat I'm talking about you. You are way past objective about this one. Please everybody let this thread die. We are embarrassing ourselves...

I don't understand how you can use players to prove your point but not allow players to disprove your point. As I said in the "other thread" he isn't a lock to go #1 let alone be the #1 qb taken in this draft. He isn't the physical specimen Cam Newton is. Red flags are red flags regardless of what they are. Manziel is 6'1 200 lbs and Newton is 6'5 245 right off the bat manziel is an injury risk with his style of play. Add in the fact that poor decision making (I don't care how bad you think his transgressions are - you can't argue they're poor choices) is not what you want from your qb. There are plenty of things to be concerned about including what will happen to this kid when he signs his contract and has millions? Will his body hold up? Will the team have to spend all week answering questions about his latest incident? Will he show up to practice not hung over? He has plenty of time to straighten this out but that is up to him. Whether he want to be the next Jamarcus Russell or if he would prefer to be Russell Wilson.

That's cool but what shirt is he wearing?

The people who posted the pic in the ifrst place?!?!?! :lol: :lol:

This is a very get off my lawnish type post right here. Daggum kids!

Except for hip-hop stars as menitoned, nba players, nfl players, and musicians. What do they all have in common? No not that they are black! (This isn't PPP) It is that they are all ENTERTAINERS. At the end of the day they all fall in the same category. None of them are blue collar or even white collar. They are no collar. Their job is to provide entertainment to the masses. Their norm is not the same norm you have sitting behind a desk.

Well done sir!

If my math is correct did you just get paid $30 for getting this subscription?

Vendetta might be a bit strong but yes he does have an issue with Stevie. That is what I am subscribing his "anger" in this thread to - at least his death by a thousand papercuts comment would lead me to believe so.

And it has. Not once last year did he do anything on the field detrimental to the team. (I'm agreeing with you so don't take this as a slight )

We know you're tired of them which is why even the smallest simplest reason gets you up in arms about him. Alright so let's go through the list of candidates: And Levitre - played good to great at G. When moved around the line (one of his best attributes supposedly) he struggled mightily. Still I won't hold it against him. I won't even hold against him the fact he bailed on Buffalo (even though Stevie had the chance and stayed). Good candidate but on the line. What is easier to replace a 3 time 1000 yard receiver or a lg (neither of which have been to the pro bowl)? Still I will give you Andy. Our running backs? Which one? The one who just broke out last year? Or the one who has spent considerable time on the injury list the last 2 years? Kyle Williams? The one who played 5 games 2 years ago? The one who has 10.5 sacks the last 3 years combined?! The one who has been part of the worst defenses in Bills History(not fair I agree but somehow you're holding Stevie to the "they lose bc of him theory)? Can't say I agree here - though I do like Kyle. Leodis? The one who only found his role last year? Byrd? The one who had 1 pick 3 years ago? Or the one who had 3 picks 2 years ago? I'll also add the "played on the worst defenses in Bills history here (again I know it's not fair but you keep holding Stevie to this standard). I didn't say Stevie is the lone bright spot. I said he has been the most consistent player on the Bills the last 3 years. He has dealt with injuries and played through them. The in-game antics? After he made a vow to not have them be an issue - did it happen even once last year? He didn't bolt for greener pastures (Levitre and possibly Byrd), hasn't missed significant time due to injury (Williams and Jackson), and has proven himself for 3 years now instead of 1 (McKelvin and Spiller). I'll give you Levitre and Byrd to be generous that still leaves him in the top 3 for this team. Tell me again how his wardrobe changes these facts?

I shouldn't know this but I do... Molly and MDMA are purer forms of ecstasy. They are kind of the same thing but not exactly. Molly=MDMA and can be refered to as ecstasy but not all ecstasy is Molly/MDMA. All squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares type thing.

This all just doesn't line up. Do you like how he performs on the field or not? Is it his fault the Bills have been losing? How about this... Who has been our most consistent offensive no forget that overall player the last 3 years? How does wardrobe choice have anything to do with anything related to the football field?

Reportedly marijuana and MDMA.

Amendolas week 17 numbers: 0 catches 0 yards. No way he isn't on ir by then. (Tongue firmly in cheek)

Sure but why/how is this shirt offensive enough to be a "paper cut?" More so has there been even the slightest bit of controversy anywhere but here? I suppose if I stretch reeeaaaalllllyyyy far I could see this as immature. I can't see it speaking anything about leadership, effort, or anything to do anything to effect him or the team on the football field. That's what I'm looking for the explanation of here. It's pretty well known that Stevie annoys you and many times although I don't agree with it I understand it. This one however I need a little help.

I don't get it. Who does this offend? How does this display immaturity? A shirt?! With *gasp* a swear word! I bet the bills pr department has much more to do with this picture being selected than Stevie. That said did anybody else miss the big deal until it was pointed out to them?