Malazan

The PS3 package is pricey, but works well. I think it was $340 last season (not bad considering like me, I don't pay for cable, direct tv, etc). It also gives you the redzone channel.

Holy mother of all things, why are you people feeding the troll? Did you really fail to see that from the start?

Obvious troll is obvious.

Ignore Billsvet, the collective Bills organization had a team bonding event where they all pissed in his cheerios. Every player that leaves the Bills is a 'good player' to him. His previous comments on Bell that include "knowing full well Bell was an injury waiting to happen." and "the OT's aren't much in pass pro". Now that Bell isn't on the Bills, it looks like his opinion has changed. -------------------------------------------- That said, this statement means nothing. What is he going to say? This new scheme is much more passive? His job is to sell hope and after experiencing the scheme 'without pads' he says it is aggressive? Keep in mind, they also have Vick and there's pages upon pages about how blocking for him is a nightmare so maybe they adjusted the scheme to accommodate his running. This is a non-starter statement.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/improve Oh, look at how clever I can be too! I understand that you're having a hard time expressing yourself, but I fail to see how your link helps. ----------------------------- If the team improves, by one win each year, every year, do you fire the people at the helm?

this thread was started by a different poster.

If the team improves, do you think it is a good idea to get rid of them? What exactly is the point that you think they should be fired at the end of this season?

Lee's reputation is much larger on this board than it is in the NFL

That quote means nothing. Much Ado about nothing. Nada. It contains no information on 'what' is different. Pass blocking is more passive, it's more technique than brawn.

So if the team improves, you want to get rid of Nix/Gailey and start all over again?

This post lacks coherence and cohesion.

If you keep replacing people after two years then you're gonna keep losing when trying to rebuild a team. If the team improves each season, then you keep them.

Fantastic Post. A little improvement can mean big things.

If you're saying, you're familiar with the legal intricacies involved in the case, I'm going to go with you may be overestimating your knowledge of the intricacies of how the law and the rules of the NFL impact this situation. You've also failed to grasp that most people are not commenting on 'the case' as much as the owners of those teams knew they were taking advantage of the situation and screwing over their business partners. Their business partners then used their powers to rebuff the actions they took when it was possible. Please convey the specific rule that they followed that you are referencing. Please provide any relevant legal citation and appropriate articles from NFL regulations.

Wade was a great co-ordinator. I'd trust his word over a lot of other people's on the issue.

They weren't innocent or unaware in all of this. They tried to take advantage of a situation and screw over the rest of the league. The rest of the league said, 'No'. That's all their is to it.

The O line was good, but it was unable to 'dominate' or 'impose their will' for a large portion of the season when injuries started to hit.

McKelvin has no value at the moment and is in a contract year. You keep him.

Thanks for clearing that up. I had no idea there was a thread on the topic.

If a team is willing to let a 'talent' go, the question 'Why?' and if they are willing to let him go for 'not too much' the question is 'What wrong with him?'

He's obviously trolling. Looks like he's caught a few already.

Apparently, no one told Wes Welker...or the countless other players that have taken the money. I feel like the numbers would support my view that player will almost always take the contract that offers them better financial compensation. As fans, I understand we feel a strong pull to believe otherwise.

I think it could be a good combination, but shouldn't half of the combo call a single play for the team before being dubbed the best ever?

Except...they're not. Look at the pissy fit they are throwing now because they didn't get control in the last CBA. Desmith went for the highest $$$ ignoring a number of other issues. Now they are throwing their own players who were targets of bounties and the guys who gave the league information on it under the bus to try get more control.

Not really that interesting. Gailey is known for tailoring his scheme to the players he has..