Malazan

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft09/insider/columns/story?columnist=mcshay_todd&id=4101407&action=login&appRedirect=http%3a%2f%2finsider.espn.go.com%2fnfl%2fdraft09%2finsider%2fcolumns%2fstory%3fcolumnist%3dmcshay_todd%26id%3d4101407 McShay:

I'm all for a good pile-on, but the wonderlic is useless.

Sal is awesome. His insights are great.

Miami seems to be pleasuring themselves to his picture. Don't see him lasting past eight.

I'd be happy to jump on the lulz bandwagon here, but the wonderlic gets a 4 on the useful scale

This is a typical 20/20 hindsight fallacy.

Perhaps, you should read through the thread and see that I responded that I do not believe it is a slight, but that others believe it is so. The people in this thread are saying that this is a slight, that Revis is intentionally ignoring Stevie. I disagree. I believe people are making mountains out of molehills.

I think McNabb is being whiny. I also think shanny is way over rated. I think he'll get them to 500ish football with RGIII. It's going to cost a fortune and won't ever win them anything unless RGIII turns out to be a manning.

my bad, my brain skipped over anyone thinking that Fred for a 1st is possible.

I think he means to swap picks, but Fred doesn't make that swap happen alone.

No.

I agree with you.

The belief is that he intentionally didn't mention Stevie Johnson..that seems like it would be a slight to me

Good lord, Buffalo fans. Grow a thicker skin, this is not a slight.

this is a good thing for everyone to keep in mind when people are posting their own 'this player needs to be drafted' posts. You think your idea is awesome, but so does this guy.

Every person that dines at Tempo gets to be a Bill! Everybody hurry for your chance now!

I meant McKelvin. Either way, not a player I'd want.

If you have to preface your post with, "don't crucify me", it's probably a bad idea. I don't understand why people keep thinking players that don't fit the mold at all should come here.

Fixed it for you.

As much as I love Fred, that is the bottom line. I think add two years at around 4.5 yo 5.5 per year. Most of it guaranteed is more than fair. Then you can add fake numbers to the end so it ends up being something like 4 years, 25 million, 10 guaranteed.

He beat you to it by a minute

who cares?

You got one right. What about the hundreds upon hundreds of guys you have absolutely no idea about? People here overlook that they get to focus on a few guys that have, for the most part, already been dissected and their strength/weaknesses pointed out. Then they focus in on this guy/that guy being good/not good and herald themselves as geniuses when they get it right and forget when they got it wrong.

It's amazing how many people think they could draft better than Nix when they don't even know when Nix joined the organization.

well, they've got whitner at 6 despite saying he's only good against the run