Malazan

I can definitely say it is a new log

I've heard of him. Git r dun

I haven't read this thread before.

You believe that the game has no impact on the increased sales in Canada and specifically the Toronto area?

Oh lord, the rumor about copyright infringement funding terrorism has hit TBD. Dodd must be doing something.

Let's make a bet that you didn't search the forum for this topic before posting this thread..

What's he like off the ball? Does he block well? Is he prone to taking plays off if he's not getting the ball?

Upset may be a strong word, but whatever his issues with the decision and the people who made it...he has been a teammate of those guys for awhile. He was part of the team. There is no benefit to them losing the Super Bowl where after a shaky start, what most people talking about is how his replacement bounced back and how strong his arm is..

It's a stupid comment, but the guy just lost the Super Bowl. It's understandable.

I've gotta say Linebacker. The QB position has to be upgraded, but I think you can survive with Fitzpatrick. The defense allowing the other team's offense to operate like it was a track meet is a big problem.

The injury reports are a joke. The Bills got dinged for it. It's safer to overcompensate.

I'm looking forward to seeing it. It does seem like a logistical nightmare though.

Here is a minute worth of time. Don't spend it all in one thread.

Even before his post-season run, he was a 20 million dollar QB. Some folks were just late to the party.

Yes, the Bills selling more season tickets to Canadians is a lie. I can't believe you kool-aiders can't see that.

What about making the playoffs? I'd also be interested in how many of these QBs performed well in in their first 3 years with a poor running game and/or a poor defense.

Well, at least he is working out during the offseason.

http://nfl.si.com/2013/02/03/first-down-fourth-down-joe-flacco-anquan-boldin-carry-champion-ravens/?sct=uk_wr_a3

Are you sure the Redskins are the team you want to use as an example? They were the number team 1 in rushing and the bottom third in passing. I'm not saying Buddy shouldn't be criticized, but the idea that they were pinning everything on Fitzpatrick and it was a ludicrous idea that he could man the ship while they looked at other areas is sort of silly. The defense would be a prime area of criticism, but the loud calls that Fitzpatrick was the worst idea in the history of sports and they were crazy for thinking it may not have been insane. You seem to have hit on my point that criticism should be more thought out than "I don't like Ryan Fitzpatrick" so I'm glad we're in agreement there.

Kaepernick had a terrible few series and threw up a terrible interception. I think he redeemed himself, but Flacco was more efficient. What specifically about the game makes you feel that Kaepernick was better?

Well, Donte tweeted he'd be better next year. From his fingertips to your eyes.

because fans feel the need to cut players to make themselves feel better even when all reason goes against it

What leads you to believe the Bills need to cut those players to sign those players? Again, cutting players because you don't like them does not improve the talent level of the team.

You can re-read my previous posts. I literally post a link that shows him as average. I'm aware of Fitz's issues and as I have previously stated, the Bills need to upgrade that position, but I'm not sure that going with Ftiz and focusing on defense was the wrong way to go.

I agree Chan Gailey was exposed. I will have to disagree that the idea that getting by with an average QB and building your defense was exposed. In fact, the 49ers had a fantastic defense and top tier running game while their passing game didn't fare as well. These numbers fairly blatantly point out that there needs to be better play from the passing offense/QB or the Defense and that while Fitz didn't do as well as the Qbs in the Super Bowl and Wilson, he wasn't out of their ballpark. I reiterate, there has to be better play from the QB or Defense. I disagree in your assertion that going the route of upgrading the defense first was the wrong decision. Of course, if you see that Ravens/49ers as having gone the route of upgrading the QB first before their defense, I'd appreciate you pointing that out to me. I am not incredibly well versed on their histories.