Malazan

You and I have different definitions of 'single'. I've always held it to mean 'one'.

Always good for a depth player to be in the club at 2AM for a team that vying for the division.

If they were caught then they were likely ejected. The Bills informed NFL security.

You can not like their plan or their performance, but if you don't support them then why are you paying attention to the team? You should be supporting them...not rooting for the "I told you so" moment.

I'm sure the players have been well informed about the testing and how to avoid it. If someone does get caught, they will scream about how Goodell is the devil and it's not true that they ate some weird Japanese candy bar which is why they tested positive.

So are the Titans..

I'll be sure to start reading his stuff. Thanks for the heads up.

I'm not having fun.

You put a lot of effort into making up a chat log.

Also, people tend to be 'right' on a curated list of prospects that have already weeded out most players. They also tend to 'forget' the guys they were wrong about and enjoy revisionist history because they don't have hundreds of thousands of fans watching their picks.

I'm not disagreeing that there is an issue, but there seems to be quite a bit of assumptions in the story. It would be good to recognize that when assessing it.

I think they play a game where one team scores 0-72 points and the other team scores 0-73 points. I may not know much about football, but I know trading with Bill for a QB seems to be a sure sign that a GM/Coach is going to be fired.

You think having a veteran start while a rookie sits behind him to learn is a bizarre idea?

Not to mention, he doesn't risk his current 'genius' label getting tarnished. If returns and flubs...well..

ask Rex Ryan

not that I disagree, but how many people on non-bills websites have seen the AFC East QBs play? Vick would likely win on name recognition alone

Stevie Johnson, Donte Whitner.

I went ahead and removed the strangely irrelevant parts of your post that didn't answer the question in anyway. Anyways, why is the NFLPA who has actively negotiated against domestic cases being subject to discipline not under fire? Why are players calling for Goodell's head when they have actively supported their Union leaders who have taken this stance?

It's still very interesting that no one is interested in the resistance from the Players Union about changing the domestic violence policy. Why? Why is this a lightning rod for Goodell? Is it just maroons who need a figurehead? Well, he's the ONLY person who knows the truth then. Why aren't you as upset at DeMaurice Smith who actively lobbied against player punishment for domestic cases?

You don't get it at all. Are you even a Bills fan? Now that he's NOT on the Bills, he's AWESOME!

Truer words never spoken.

Good rule of thumb imo

because actual football matters little to a portion of this board..the constant, non-stop kvetching whether it is valid or invalid is what really matters.

"The best thing to do when a thread is locked is start a thread asking why the thread is locked." ~ Albert Einstein

Who do people calling for his head think should take over? Do they think said person would have done better in regards to domestic violence? Has the player's union expressed support for reforming the personal conduct code before this? Do they now? Why isn't DeMaurice Smith under fire?