Malazan

We're not here to kink shame. You do you.

I thought the cards just drafted a QB...why are they angling for the #1 overall pick?

How much of the covid did you drink?

So what you're saying is that you just hate everything all of the time?

They should keep a QB on the roster just for this..Fitz might shake loose in Miami when Tua takes over.

I feel like the dude with the hulk hand on a stick needs to give more effort

I don't think it will be as big of a deal as it seems, but an NHL game is a different experience. The way fans interact with the game is wholly different (like a direct effect on the opposition when they're trying to call plays). Not to mention ~15-20k people compared to 60k plus.

Not necessarily surprised he didn't know that before ?

Pass.

turns out there's big money in being a douchebag. You have no problem screwing people over and other douchebags will love you.

Unfortunately, Joe Douglas seems competent so I doubt he makes this move. Just signing this guy to the massive contract he'll get is a mistake let alone any draft capital used for him.

If only there was an entity that was responsible for investigating crimes...

I hope the Jets do everything they can to get him a 1000 yard season

Oh, just f*ck you, 2020

Yes, there are exception that prove the rule, but I wouldn't take those odds in vegas

It's not a personal attack to point out that you're wrong...

If you pointed out all the times he's wrong...you won't have time to do anything else.

Diggs is an important piece and I don't think it's easy to quantify how a true #1 can have a cascading effect on the rest of the offense. It's a make or break year for Allen because: - This is about as good of supporting cast on offense as you can expect (to be clear, not saying they're great or amazing, but year in / year out you can't expect much better) so if he can't do it with these guys...then he's not going to be able to do it most years - QBs who dwell in the bottom of the rankings for 3 straight years generally don't go on to become 'good' QBs - Continuity on offense - A clear and fixable problem (deep ball) that could change the entire offense (defenses have to back up and open up more allowing easier reads) - Diggs, even if he only meets lower expectations here, is a game changer. His abilities line up in this offense and Allen's problem areas. He pushes two very good receivers down the depth chart into roles they should be able to flourish in as well. - If he can't read defenses or continues to struggle under pressure that's not likely en 'experience' issue any more If Allen can't get the offense out of the basement this year then it's pretty unlikely he's going to...History isn't kind to QBs who dwell in the bottom of the rankings for 3 straight years. I say all of this as a huge Allen fan. He's a gamer and I love his mentality, but he's got to show he can take an offense to the middle of the pack in the NFL. Yes, if that happened then that would be an extremely tough situation to overcome, but regardless of supporting cast..a QB needs to perform at some point and QBs who have had poor stats and offenses for 3 years rarely 'turn it around' even with a better supporting cast.

damn...Belichick has jedi mind tricked them into recording themselves for him...

I'm not sure he makes their roster. He's 32 and coming off his worst year in a rather unremarkable career.

Hey look, it's a solution looking for a problem to solve!

I mean, Jamal Adams got 2 1st round picks and a serviceable safety in return despite not wanting to play for his team. If he can cover and occasionally get to the passer, I'd trade him in a heartbeat.

can't tell if you're for real of a caricature of a person Yea, you're right. Like...why would you stand up to people violating your rights. Bend over and take it. If the cops are just going violate your rights and violate the law then you should just give up.

Did you make a typo?

It's not a citizen's responsibility to prevent any appearance of possibly violating a law. It is simply to follow the law. In no way, do you have to ensure the police 'don't get the wrong idea'. It is an officer's responsibility to discern whether a law has actually been broken (despite a couple court rulings saying an officer ignorant of the actual law acting in 'good faith' is justified). Now, you can say it's common sense not to have an empty can somewhere within reach of the driver to make it easier for police to discern the situation. That's an open debate, but appearance of impropriety does not violate the law.