TallskiWallski83
-
Posts
426 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by TallskiWallski83
-
-
edit: ooops you want pictures that make us feel BETTER....right...sorry.
-
Makes you wonder if theyre thinking about moving Cordy Glenn to G if one of the top tackles falls to them...or drafting Warmack.
EIther way I dont see why this is anything to freak out about. Guard is one of the easiest positions to replace in the entire NFL.
-
For what its worth:
Written in 2012:
After having played outside in San Francisco’s 3-4, it was interesting watching Lawson adjust to playing in a four-man front. He surpassed almost all expectations and, if anything, looked more suited to the Bengals’ scheme. While Lawson may only be a two-down player (he graded negatively in coverage) he does have some versatility in that he can play with his hand on the ground if needed. He hasn’t quite had the success of Kamerion Wimbley in Oakland but he is a solid role player who should continue to improvement
Written in 2013:
Thegood: Lawson is a solid run defender who can play in the 4-3 or 3-4 defense. He is a sure tackler, missing just three all of last season. Lawson played in every game in his two seasons in Cincinnati, although there were some games in which he played less than half the snaps.Thebad: There were expectations that Lawson would boost the pass rush, but he managed 3.5 sacks in his two years with the Bengals. He also looked rigid in pass coverage, which is why he only broke up one pass last season.Thebottomline: The Bengals have enough cap room to upgrade from Lawson. He is only 28 and a former first-round pick, so he should catch on with another team.According to Pro Football Focus, out of 43 eligible linebackers, Lawson ranked 37th in total snaps (363). That averages out at just 23 snaps per game in a 16-game season. His -4.9 grade was also ranked 29th. Lawson simply isn’t a fit in Mike Zimmer’s defensive scheme, and likely won’t be offered a contract to return to Cincinnati when free agency begins.
-
For some perspective:
1. Carl Nicks, Buccaneers – $12,500,000
2. Davin Joseph, Buccaneers – $9,500,000
3. Chris Snee, Giants – $7,900,000
4. Logan Mankins, Patriots – $7,000,000
5. Marshall Yanda, Ravens – $6,500,000
I think a lot of posters are failing to realize the grand scheme of things here. If the Bills signed Levitre they would be parlaying his deal and cap hit, along with Fitzpatricks 7 million dollar cap hit into next season. The NFL has a salary cap in place for a reason, you cant keep every good player on your team indefinitely. I would much rather say goodbye to Levitre now then have to say goodbye to Eric Wood next year or CJ Spiller the following year.
If you are really upset about losing Levitre but were very pro signing Mario Williams, then this is what happens. You cant be a buyer every year.
-
Never should have let him leave.
-
1) He wasn't bitching
2) He wasn't complaining
Lamenting would be a better word. But I know a few people that are bitching and complaining. Try to get those panties unknotted before posting.
If I'm tampas GM listening to Nix on the phone Im thinking Nix is not one of the smarter guys in the group of 31 I have to work with and compete against.
Thats as simple as I can put it while leaving my emotions about his dealings with Fitz out of it.
-
The lack of knowledge most posters have when it pertains to running a business, and PUBLICLY managing that business and employees is painfully obvious. People here expect our GM to give the media completely honest answers right from the hip. They'll site Nix backing Fitz in the media previously, as if he could have said anything else.
It's just posters showing their typical ignorance in order to find something to complain about.
I have no problem with the "off the cuff" remarks made by Nix. What I have a problem with is him bitching about the unfairness of not having a franchise QB like the Colts. Then he goes on complaining about how hes handcuffed by Fitz, when he was the one who labeled him as our franchise QB in the first place and also the GM who refused to draft and develop a guy behind him should he fail.
Idk how some of you guys arent angered by this?!?!?! This man went on WGR weekly all season long and adamently defended Fitz as "his guy", and referred to him as our "franchise QB", and that fitz "has been successful before and will be successful again"
Im happy he doesnt like Fitz now but honestly...he should have been fired for it.
-
And you learned this in your many years of experience as an NFL General Manager?
You've never been part of or even heard any NFL GM's private conversations until this one. You have no idea if these two are friends or what their relationship. You have no idea what prior conversations they've. Basically, you have no idea what you are talking about. But carry on.
I'm going off what I listened to. The last thing our GM should be doing is bitching about our QB and how hes handcuffing the franchise when just two years ago you loved the guy, believed in him, and signed him to a ridiculous unwarranted contract extension. Nix created the entire situation hes complaining about, he sounds like a buffoon complaining about it.
-
Couple of thoughts:
-Buddy sounds slightly inept in this phone call... it almost sounds like he thinks its unfair that teams like the colts get Luck and hes stuck with Fitz.
-Nix publicly defended Fitz multiple times throughout the last 2 years and he gave him the ridiculous extension, depsite his physical limitiations. To complain about Fitz to another GM, when you are THE REASON why you are in the situation in the first place, makes you sound really inept.
-I feel worse about the running of our franchise now then at any point in the last 5-10 years.
-I know Buddy got pranked but the comments he made to tampa GM showed weakness. If you listen carefully Tamps GM doesnt say much, he just listens to Nix. When youre a GM you need to puff your chest and flex your muscles and act like your team knows what youre doing, even if if you dont.
-If I were owner, this would be a fireable offense.
-
If seattle gave up anything less than a 1st round pick for this man Im going to be very pissed off that the Bills did not up the anty.
-
I could write an essay on this subject, but when is some downtrodden franchise going to decide they are tired of waiting for a franchise QB to save them and start using a multiple QB system in the NFL?
I am not talking about the "hot hand" system of QB management, but rather having 2-3 QB's with particular strengths and taking the chance on rotating them in and out during the game.
It seems that more and more NFL ready QB's are going to be entering the league. Not necessarily elite QB's, but guys with a lot of experience in pro-style offense and with their own strengths and weaknesses.
As a Bills fan, we have had to suffer thru so many performances where you know that the defense knows exactly what Ryan Fitzpatrick, Trent Edwards, JP Losman, Kelly Holcomb can and can't do and it seems incredibly defeatist to just keep taking your beating like that.
Yet these same QB's have had success at various times.....usually when defenses weren't prepared.
We saw in 1998 how two journeyman QB's......one a strong armed and accurate but sack prone pocket passer and one an un-sackable undersized guy who made huge plays outside of the pocket but struggled within it.......could take a team with an average supporting cast on offense and make it 7th in the league in scoring and 6th in yards gained. Those type of numbers are usually reserved for teams with elite QB production. Sadly, a glorified DC like Wade Phillips wasn't going to be the guy to take advantage of a 2 QB system. Rather having to decide just about destroyed him.
But a strong head coach with a great offensive staff could do it, IMO. I could be wrong but I think the time is coming.
Good OP and definitely something I have considered before. Obviously, NFL head coaches are stubborn mules when it comes to change so I think this is the biggest hurdle that would have to be overcome, someone innovative would have to make the first step, be successful,, then everyone would follow.
Strategically speaking I think their are many advantages to running a system using two different QB's with different skills sets. Imagine having two running QBs and a RB lined up in a wildcat and all 3 players are capable of running/throwing/catching... a team who could run plays effectively with guys like that would be unstoppable.
The only downsides I envision are A. Not having a "leader" of the team B. Not having "the guy" to rally the team and lead the offense when the game is on the line C. Obviously the 2 QB's Egos would have to be checked at the door, they would both sacrifice fame and fortune for team success....a concept that is rare in todays NFL.
-
McKelvin has the physical specs to be a great CB in this league but it has been the "football awareness" part of the game that has hindered his play on the field. We all know Mckelvin can run step for step with any WR in the nfl, the problem is that everytime a pass is completed on him he is in position but fails to turn his hips around and locate the ball to swat it away, Mckelvin is also one of those guys that plays better when his confidence is high, it has been pretty trying for him over the past two years because he has been benched a couple times for poor play and you know that has hurt his confidence, which is critical for a DB.
Pettine is supposedly a guru with DBs and look what he did with Antonio Cromartie this year, he took a guy with immense physical talent and poor football IQ and turned him into a stud. McKelvin has all the ability in the world to live up to this 4 year 20 million dollar deal and hopefully the bills are rewarded for their faith. Throw in the bonus return ability and now we have one less hole to address in FA and in the draft and I think its a win win for both sides
-
the FA crop this year might be the best we've seen in years. After looking at all the CBs that are hitting the market, it looks like McKelvin may actually have a realistic chance of resigning with Buffalo.
-
Kaepernick had a terrible few series and threw up a terrible interception. I think he redeemed himself, but Flacco was more efficient. What specifically about the game makes you feel that Kaepernick was better?
I didnt say he was better. Both QBs played incredibly well and the game came down to the final seconds. OP is stating the obvious that pocket passers are the only ones who win SBs which historically has been true. However, the game yesterday came down to the final moments because Kaep led an incredible comeback...eventually a runner is going to win this thing and all this nonsense will be thrown out the window.
Kaep is the real deal. He may have the best arm out of any QB in the NFL and I literally have no idea how any defense in the NFL is going to be able to stop the 49ers over the next 5 years as he only gets better and better and they maintain their dominate O line.
-
I understand the whole "scrambling QB's" havent won a superbowl argument you are making, but there is no way you can tell me that Flacco outplayed Kaepernick in that game. Also the scramblers in the league now (Kap, Wilson, RGIII) are on a whole different level than Vick ever was. They can all sit in the pocket and make laser throws if they need to. I think that the tide of the league is shifting towards having a QB who can run, that isnt to say that true pocket passers are going anywhere because the elite decision makers like Manning, Brady, Rodgers, Brees dont need to run to be effective. Lastly, Warren Moon was never a scrambling QB I think you meant Randall Cunningham
-
I also feel bad for Charles Haley & Aeneas Williams, they are more deserving than Carter & Sapp.
Aeneas Williams was one of the best cornerbacks of the last 20 years...its too bad he played for for the Cardinals and wasnt the hype machine like Deion Sanders was.
-
Carter is deserving....maybe not more than Reed but he is worthy. Sapp is a POS fraud who played on some great defenses but I dont think he is a first ballot HOF. Its a disgrace that Reed isnt in yet, everyone knows hes going to get in one day...why they decide to get his hopes up and then crush them year after year is beyond me...
KELLY, THOMAS, SMITH, _________
Those are the 4 guys you think of when you think of the Bills.
-
this is as good of a chance Reed will ever get. I think hes going to finally join the party, this class isnt very strong compared to most years.
-
I like the renovations. For the 130 million dollars theyre spending it looks like theyre getting a lot. I wish they could widen the concourses but the rest of these improvements should make up for it, I for one am ecstatic that the bathrooms will finally not be shitholes anymore.
-
or
E) He was the victim of a hoax. Couldn't that also be possibility?
Not sure why everyone finds the online relationship so hard to believe. And the kid doesn't need to be *stupid* to believe it was real, just naive...
Anyone watching the ND Press Conference?
No no no. First of all, hes talked openly about meeting her in person, which of course he never did. Also, even if he had and he really considered her his girlfriend, dont you think when she died if he would have gone to her funeral? Kinda seems something a boyfriend would do.
-
Here is what bugs me a little about this....
The press will seemingly report anything they are told and keep telling it over and over. They want a story and don't need to check anything. The girlfriend story, even the dead one isn't really a huge deal. It is sick but that's all. It's not like that guy that got arrested for bombing the Olympics in Salt Lake because a bunch of people were speculating. There have been other bad stories too like Lance Armstrong being a great hero. That crap went on for years. You don't even need to research that issue; you can tell he is a liar just by looking at him.
With Te'o though, the press really doesn't have much to lose.. It will blow over for them because they all cover for each other.
Here is what bugs me MOST about this.....
Almost every mock draft you see has the Bills taking Te'o at #8. The Bills DO have something to lose. A lot of $$$$$$ and another wasted pick. I wanted to believe this new regime was better than the old one but I guess not. They should have investigated this before deciding on Te'o. I suspect they will shy away from him now which only means they got lucky but why they had him pegged in the first place without discovering this major character flaw is amazing to me. Do you think Bellichick would have ever picked a guy like this?
so a mock draft has the Bills taking Te'o and that means Nix is going to do exactly that.
I love the logic bro, love it.
-
If true (how could it not be?!) this man is a sick twisted F to tha U to tha C to tha K and should be crossed off of all NFL draft boards.
-
bowes the only one thats realistic and interests me on that entire list
-
Why do you have to choose between wood and levitre?
Im not a salary cap expert but I just dont see how the bills can afford to keep Byrd, Levitre, and Wood without putting themselves in cap trouble a couple years down the road. I believe Byrd is a core-blue chip player on this team and we absolutely cannot afford to lose a playmaker like him. I think Levitre is great but G's in the NFL are replaceable and if it means losing Levitre so we can resign a player like Spiller or Gilmore 3/4 years down the line I chose that option.
Has anyone seen this team worse off than right now?
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted · Edited by TallskiWallski83
this.
I think the best way to approach the '13 draft is to take a QB in the 2nd or 3rd round and plan on starting him. Best case scenario the rook is good and he takes the team to the playoffs. If not, the team should be completely open to drafting one of the elite guys in '14.
Essentially Im willing to burn a 2nd/3rd round pick on a one year tryout for one of these QB's. The worst thing the Bills could do is commit to one of these guys long term...we'll just be back here again 5 years from now.