I'd say the same thing I did before last season-this team could have a worse record than Jauron's last bunch, but still be a better team. It's just in the nature of the way Jauron coached. I still don't like a lot of what they do as a franchise, but rating them below the boring, brittle, spineless, clueless, dickless wonder of a team they fielded 2 years ago is ridiculous.
Are there actually people that said last year's team was worse than Jauron's purely because of the W-L record? That's straight up stupid.