Jump to content

RyanC883

Community Member
  • Posts

    15,293
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RyanC883

  1. Samuel is not a scheme fit and an overreach. We are okay at CB2 with Jackson, etc. Not need to reach. Trade up for Stokes in Rd. 2, in fact, take him here, but not Samuel.
  2. what's wrong with Barramore at DT?
  3. he is def a crabby/disgruntled guy generally I think, but it doesn't help when your team takes a freaking QB in the first round when in a SB window, then actively shops you before the draft.
  4. I think the Packers take him. Need to keep Rodgers happy here.
  5. RB Williams is my guy here for Buf
  6. well, Williams is still on the board. The Steelers need OL more to protect Ben.
  7. Wilson, not even close. At least Lawrence has a reason to be cocky.
  8. Wilson is sooooooo overrated.
  9. Assuming the Bills trade the pick (an assumption for sure), what's the thought, will the Bills trade up or down and out of the 1st round? I think a trade up is more likely given Bean's history and the 5th round tender. However, if the player is not available, or the trade structure is not correct, I can see Bean going back to get more players in later rounds (where, generally, we've had more success, IMO).
  10. Love this idea, not sure who is out there that fits the young, proven player for pick 30? I'd trade a 1st for Mack. I think he has 3-4 years left of elite production.
  11. so, the packers get a TON of picks, plus Gimmy J, and they said no. Then why on earth did they draft a QB in the first round last year? Just Packers are wtf.
  12. I totally get that, and Harris is my RB 1 in the draft, but I don’t see Williams thet far behind.
  13. i agree. it is likely for a de. the draft is super think at impact guys there. one of the 3 top RBs will be there at 30, so why trade?
  14. good points. I still don’t want Fields on Pats. clearly Watson on pats would be much worse
  15. in win now mode, I wouldn’t draft him until the 5th. (4th if we had one). CB is decently deep, and we need a potential day 1 guy either as starter or rotation/backup.
  16. I hate this. Pats get Fields, and get the 3rd best RB. Williams is still available and is a better fit than Etienne.
  17. very possible he wouldn’t. I just don’t know of he is worth a 3rd, depends on who else is available I suppose. will be fun to watch. I could see us trading into 4th or something for a 1T Weaver, DE Pitt. We need Edge help. He is very productive in college. Projects as a better run stopper than pass rusher but knows how to get behind the LOS and cause havoc.
  18. Frazier was awful those two games. Those game plans are why we got destroyed both times.
  19. I like Bobby Brown also, but RD 3 seems a bit early. I think he may be around in 5.
  20. I think Harris and Williams are the top 2 RB’s in the draft. I think one is there at 30 so I don’t get trading up for a RB. DE, which is thin beyond the top 2 makes the most logic. thats why Etitene makes no sense. Not as good a pass catcher or blocker as Harris or Williams, IMO.
  21. thanks @Virgilfor running this! if we do a 3.0 count me in. Love these and appreciate everything you do to run it!
×
×
  • Create New...