CSBill

Fred jackson is everything you would want in a football player, a teammate, the face/voice of your team, and as a team leader. Moreover, sports don't necessarily build character (they can, but it's not an automatic), but what they do is, reveal character: good and bad. And if what I see from Fred Jackson on the field is an indication, I would be willing to bet he is an outstanding husband, father, neighbor, and friend . . . the truly important issues of life. Anyhow, yes, he will start to show his age, but I still believe he is one of the most important players on this team right now. And as long as he can still be productive, there is no need to reduce his role or even consider getting rid of him. He is a true professional, and he is a leader in every sense of the word, and as such, is still a very vital part of the Buffalo Bills.

I do agree, my hunch is, all three of the top three QBs will drop . . . I would even bet that two of them will be available when the Bills pick at 9 . . . not that I want us to pick any of the three . . . but the bad news is, this means some of those top players we thought might be available, will probably not be (I doubt any of the three OTs, or the two WRs will be there at 9).

Ha Ha Clinton Dix

Yeah, if that weight is fat, but if that weight is muscle, and he's more healthy, then why is that a bad thing?

I've heard the reasons, and none of them sound compelling to me. I hope they move it back to April.

i want to see this this !!!!!!

That, my friends is good journalism from our own Chris Brown. I wish he did more things like this on the Bills website.

There are a lot of college ball players with this body type and good athleticism, parade as many of them as you can through TBD, the precedent has been established that they can make that transition well: Gates, Graham, etc.

My Response: I want to believe in Manuel. The jury is still out, some signs of greatness, but so much more to do.

Well, to be honest, there is nothing about this list that excites me. Maybe Ebron proves to be a stud, but I'm not are the Bills need him (compared to other needs).

yes, to both

this

The next Russell Wilson => Johnny Manziel Plays just like him, similar in size, and Manziel is statistically more accurate (in college) than Wilson, same level, if not better, of competition

yuuup, trade for an okay number two, and get rid of your number one . . . that makes perfect sense

Two things . . . 1) O-lineman are the safest bet in round one 2) No team has ever regretted building a strong (elite) offense lineman I say draft one of the big-three tackles, and 2 or 3 more solid o-lineman in the rest of the draft

this !

low risk, high reward type of move . . . let's hope it works out

step brother

great idea, thanks

aaaahhh, brings back fond memories of guys like, "He Hate Me"

ouch, that hurts

that would be a dream scenario

Wow, I've trudged through almost all of this, and I'm still not sure what to think. My conclusion, the only huge difference maker at 1 (vs. 9), is Clowney. If the Bills can swing a reasonable trade to get him, I would be okay with that. Other than that, I see no need to do it. It appears there will be guys there at 9 whom can make a difference right away (previous Bills draft history aside, they can't really blow it that bad this time, can they?)