SactoBillFan

shhhht!

That would be nice.

Need to score with this possession.

Want to see me eat this booger?

Should be a defining "flirt for all".

Yep, team got booed off the field last week.

Great post as always Lori. Hopefully we can finally win one in Oakland. I wish I could see the game on TV, unfortunately it's blacked out here. I'm still contemplating "risking life and limb" and taking the drive to the Black Hole. Probably safer driving to Tahoe.

Yankees pitchers are getting healthy. Good luck.

Back in Sacramento. Finally got a chance to post. It was great to meet all you guys and put a face with the posters here. Thanks a bunch to AIO for introducing me around. It was too cool meeting SDS, Cablelady, 89, AIO, JoeSixPack, Bill and Pat in Livonia, Jay, rRich, MadCap etc. etc. People were great, game was great. Thanks everyone. Last weeks game was a disapointment, hopefully we'll turn it around in about an hour. Off to Stingers now to see the game.

I wouldn't wish injury on anyone. But, I'd rather play NE with Flutie at the helm as opposed to Brady.

Hard to say. In theory, no player should be irreplaceable as there should be enough depth. Still I'd rather have Nate in the game. If the Bills can't win without him, then forget about a playoff team.

SactoBillFan - One spot general if it's still available.

Glad I booked early. I'll be in on Friday. Looking forward to meeting some of you.

Karl Rove is a d-bag. And he's a criminal. And so are all of you who can't speel and have bad gremmer.

I went ahead and bought the pair. I'm way too excited no w. Thanks guys.

Cool. Thanks Jay.

Going home to Olean for a week in September and figured I'd make opening day. I'm looking on the internet for a pair of tickets. I know I'm going to overpay. But its worth it to finally see the Bills in Buffalo. Are Section 136 Row 5 good seats? They appear descent from the chart. 137 Row 8? These are running about $125 at coasttocoasttickets.com. Has anyone ever bought tickets from there? http://www.coasttocoasttickets.com/buy/bills_tickets.htm I'd be grateful for any help. It'd be nice to meet some of the wallers there.

Good job answering the question. You would make a good politician.

Ever heard of steryotypes? "Irish are drunks", "Blacks are lazy", "Mexicans are thieves", "Jewish people worship money", "Orientals can't drive", "Polocks are stupid", "Police are corrupt and love donuts", etc. etc. oh yeah and "Democrats are liberal while Republicans are conservative" etc. etc. The better question is: Have you ever heard of masculine bovine excrement?

I'm pretty sure they also differ on the privatization of Social Security. Otherwise you're probably right.

Welcome to the 2000's. Can you prove that Iraq had WMD's in the year 2002 (no). Neither Clinton nor Kennedy (?) ordered the invasion and occupation of Iraq. The weapons inspectors left in 2003 because hell was coming. Iraq IS currently being occupied primarily by the US. "Global War on Terror" is a great catch phrase. War on Drugs, War on Poverty, how about a War on Mickey D's, that'll keep people from getting fat. Don't know what the cost should be but it should be spent in the right place. There were WMDs when? Can you prove they were there when we mobilized? Can you prove real Al-queda ties when we mobilized? Had them on the run and then created a reason to increase their size. I don't remember us invading and occupying Russia. Last I checked, correct me if I'm wrong, Viet Nam was still a Communist country. Please remind me where Reagan said anything like that. You could be right there. I'm not sure. So when we win such a war, then we'll exit Iraq? Well time will tell. Sure your right, first I am an idiot. Also, the neo-conservative movement has no interest in controlling the worlds resources. And wars are never about money. Further, Isreal neither needs our aid nor protection. Brilliant. I have no clue what the "Oil for Food" scandal in the UN has to do with us invading and occupying Iraq. So what was true in the 90's is still true today? Our administration lied. Whatever, someone once said trust those who seek the truth not those who profess to know it. Oooh that sounds like fun.

Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace 2.3 million jobs added last year Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Cut deficit in half by 2009 Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace 105 Gov programs to cut Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace No Child Left Behind Successful Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Increase size of Pell Grants Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Comprehensive Tax Plan Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Immigration Reform Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Social Security Broke in 2017 Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Voluntary Personal Retirement Acounts Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Constitutional Amendment on Marriage Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Judicial Nominees up or down vote Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace HIV bad Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Syria and Libia really bad Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Iran really really bad Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Iraqi elections good (I hope so too) Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace Exit Strategy Dunno Freedom, Democracy, Liberty, Peace I've had enough to drink now.

I hope your wrong. But I suspect your right.

An excellent rebuttal from another resident genius. Call the person a liberal, ok whatever, everyone will laugh, so now one doesn't have to argue against what appears to be the truth. Come on, give me a real argument (that is a set of premises whose conclusion is supposed to point to the truth). Do you care about the truth Darin? Or is your whole gig about denigrating people for their opinions? Come on, give me an argument as Darin sees the truth. Please, not another proof by exhaustion where you tried to prove that Clinton destroyed the military. Please, Mr. individualist kind of guy, site your sources if you must, but please give me Darins' conclusions, if you're capable of forming such abstract notions. I've been busy, but I'll get back to you given you have the "fortitude" to respond with a real argument implying that this lunatic is wrong. Please avoid the usual diatribe where both parties are a-holes therefore and you don't give a rats ass and hence the "liberal" is an idiot. I tend to think that for you denigrating people is a much more fun sport than engaging in a true argument. Take a logic class, calling a person a "liberal" doesn't disprove their opinion.

I'm not sure I do either. Perhaps you'd like to explain these "reasons" to one less intellectually endowed as yourself?