2009: The Bills played the NFC South and AFC South and only 1 of those teams finished with fewer than 7 wins.
2012: Not done yet obviously. The Bills playing the AFC South and NFC West. The Jags will not make 7 wins. The Titans and Cards most likely will not make 7 wins, but the Rams have a good chance. Only the Texans come anywhere close to the Manning Colts and Brees Saints of 09. Looks like an easier schedule than 09, no?
As well as everyone that argued the same.
I'm not going to speak for the board, but I don't think the terms "talent" and "skill" are really so conflated in the business. Scouts are often called "talent evaluators" and with good precision. A scout is supposed to see past the environment around a player and identify the player's inherent talent and assess the ceiling of his ability. Everyone has heard the tautology "Coaches coach." More precisely it is the coach's job to take whatever talent they have and hone its skills and develop the team and put in place systems that accentuate the strengths of the team. The GM's job is to make sure he has the right mix of coaches, players, and talent evaluators to be successful.
Anyway, there's a bit of wanting it both ways. For instance, if we're going to say the team has better depth, are we stating that based on talent or demonstrated skill? It's not fair to say Troup sucks, right? Is it fair to say a GM is doing a great job but excuse poor results? Or pin the blame on the GM's choice of coaching staff? Is it fair to compare the talent potential of a guy that played with a bad wrist to the skill of a Pro Bowler but only as displayed in his last season? Or the skill of a guy with much off-field baggage playing behind one of the worst OLs in an offense called by a rookie coach to a guy's skills behind a good OL in a system designed to maximize his numbers?