Jump to content

NickelCity

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,851
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NickelCity

  1. We have decent coverage. We have horrible run defense. Even if he is a "one down linebacker" that does his job, he will be worth it. Currently, we do not have one of those. Stopping the run is priority 1b for the bills (1a being QB play). It is essential.
  2. I love all the comments like "I don't know if I want Spikes. He's excellent against the run but a liability in the passing game." Our atrocious run defense is nearly as responsible as poor QB play in terms of losing games. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
  3. I have to imagine our draft plan goes: 1. WR 2. best LB or RT 3. best LB or RT (obviously whichever position wasn't selected in rd 2) Maybe our most preferred is to trade down in rd1 to pick up an extra 2nd rounder, then ad TE to the mix. After round 3 I want to see us take at least 2 guards.
  4. He's been solid from Day 1.
  5. I think Watkins is going to be a star, but I don't think we'll have a shot at him. My best guess is Evans or a trade down.
  6. Man I can't imagine getting to play for the Bills. Good stuff.
  7. I would be excited if I were a Browns fan. Sure, they had a hilarious GM/coach debacle, but they're putting together/shooting for a solid foundation.
  8. This is exactly the type of CB we should bring in. I, for one, will be pleased with this signing.
  9. Yep. This one's a bit frustrating, but I'd like to take an OG in rd1 or rd3, so I'll continue to hope for that. I DO like that they signed someone, but I don't like hoping for an elevation in performance from the get go. Here's to assumptions and polian being spot on.
  10. The way you set this up, I was almost certain it would be the peter pan link.
  11. from kffl: Giants | Scheduled to meet with Jameel McClain Wed, 05 Mar 2014 11:12:55 -0800 Free-agent LB Jameel McClain (Ravens) said he is scheduled to meet with the New York Giants. - See more at: http://kffl.com/hotw#sthash.SVOsNv3F.dpuf
  12. I'd like to sign several LBs and a CB for sure. Some OLine depth would be nice. Maybe a safety but it depends on what our scheme will be. In the draft but I'd like a G and OT in the first 4 rounds, and another G/C in the 5th or 6th. Sprinkle in a WR and TE (probably one of these will be rd. 1) and, voilà. Of course, that necessitates a defense heavy FA. We need to fix our OLine.
  13. Judging from their absurd re-interpretation of history in the textbooks they produce for the country, I'm not positive they care about actual education. (*sweeping generalization)
  14. I think every player should be doing it. Hip flexor and groin injuries would go way down I imagine.
  15. I'm not convinced any lasting change, or perhaps the degree of change desired, would come via the applications explicitly mentioned in this thread. However, I do know first hand that a former GM wanted a different and more powerful technology at his disposal for multiple positions and reasons (beyond just mental development).
  16. Way past due, but really happy for 83.
  17. I have to imagine there's a very high likelihood of that occurring.
  18. Well would ya look at that.
  19. I noticed that earlier today. I wont lie, I laughed. Obviously.
  20. I imagine they will end up taking one in the 4th. I bet we get a better "prospect" than we think, too.
  21. Well I hate it because he's awful and we're doomed, but also because he's going to be poached next offseason after doing well, continuing our merry-go-round of coaches.
×
×
  • Create New...