Jump to content

947

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,687
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 947

  1. You beat me to posting the 40 times.... Just from watching a few plays- Compton plays much faster than Preston Brown. No comparison. Compton would be a great fit.
  2. They'll take QB at #1, no way they can pass that up. It'd make sense for them trade out of #4 with us, to go after an OT at #12 and Guice at #21.
  3. I agree with this. Roquan could be an elite MLB in McD's Defense. He's the only non-QB they'd consider at #12 IMO.
  4. I would MUCH rather take Roquan Smith at 12 & Rudolph at 22 than this.
  5. You forgot Rudolph. Otherwise, I agree with your list.
  6. Barf!, this draft is the worst case scenario. We move up to #12 & take freaking Allen? Ok, if he's McBeane's guy- at least we didn't trade up to top-3 & do it. And we still have #22 to get a nice LB. Nope, we take a Center. And a 2nd tier prospect no less.
  7. We absolutely must add starters at the following positions (in order): LB, QB, RT, WR, DT LB- We could really use 2 LBs- I think we probably draft one & also sign a FA. I'm hoping for Roquan/Vander Esch/Evans at #22. QB- Even if the plan is to not trade-up & start McCarron- we still draft QB somewhere in Rd 1. OL- Need an upgrade at RT & RG. Will be hard to draft one that can start this year if we trade 3+ picks to move up for a QB. Late 1st thru 2nd round has a ton of solid OL prospects. Maybe we can snag Billy Price late in the 3rd & hope he can play this year. I hope we sign an OL before the draft. WR- Any drafted WR won't be much help in year 1. Probably a low-cost FA vet on a 1-2 year deal. DT- Need to draft a DT that can contribute this year, & start in 2019. DE- I don't see us pursuing any more DEs. Hughes, Murphy, Shaq, Yarborough, Lorax, & Ola gives us 6.
  8. Seems like a perfect fit, but give up no more than a 4th rounder.
  9. Whitehead is exactly the type of up-and-comer I'd think McBeane would be all over. Similar to the Hyde signing last year, solid player for his old team, but he could come to Buffalo & really excel.
  10. I'd be OK with this, as long as the rookie is Mayfield or Rosen. The other rookies will need as much as a full season on the bench before playing, in that case, I'd like a Foles or McCarron for 2018.
  11. Eagles rejected a 2nd when there were 5+ teams that needed a vet QB. My point is that is just became a buyers' market in the past 2 hours.
  12. If it's not Foles or McCarron, I'd rather roll Peterman out there than McCown anybody in tier 3.
  13. Seems like everybody else has signed a QB, and almost all the bridge QBs are now taken. Are we the last team that could want Foles? Pretty sure the Eagles have to get his contract off their books. If we're the only bidder, I could see a 3rd getting it done.
  14. I really think it'll be Pryor, in a week or 2, after the frenzy dies down of course. I think Moncrief & John Brown will be getting way too much money, after what Richardson just got. I don't see us spending that much at WR.
  15. I'd rather see a trade of our 2019 1st to move up, than to give up #22.
  16. It's this type of thinking that cost us 6 more elite years from London Fletcher.
  17. We need to add 2 starting LBs, and it's doubtful we can get both in the draft. I think we take a LB at #22 (Vander Esch or Evans), but need a FA too. Nigel Bradham, Zach Brown, or Tahir Whitehead- would absolutely be impact LB signings for the Bills. All good fits for us, hopefully the prices come down after the initial FA frenzy.
  18. Willie Snead is a possession/slot WR, just like the 2 WRs we currently have. He is the opposite of what we need, we need a down-field threat. It's like you guys just jump on names you've heard of, without knowing what they can do. Meredith maybe could be a fit, but is coming off a major injury, and not worth giving anything up.
  19. I'd be happier if we took Rudolph at 12, than if we took Allen at 22. If we trade up for Allen, I'm gonna need a vacation.
  20. This is EXACTLY what I came in this thread to post. Allen is a going to be the next huge QB bust, which sucks for him because he belongs nowhere near the first round conversation, but he keeps getting rammed down everyone's throats to the point that he could go top-10. I admit, aggressively trading up and taking a probable bust would be a Billsy thing to do. I think Beane knows better.
  21. Pretty much. My main point was that if GB signs Watkins, both Cobb & Nelson will be on the FA market.
  22. Because tying that much cap space up in the WR position would be asinine. They're about to re-do Rodgers' deal to something like Jimmy G got, and their Defense has multiple needs, that money would be better spent here. Sure, they could probably figure out a way to keep 3 expensive WRs on their roster, but I just don't see it happening.
  23. Packers would have to cut both Jordy & Cobb to afford Sammy, but I don't see either as a fit for us. Cobb doesn't fit our needs at all. We need a deep threat, not another possession WR, already have 2 of those. Jordy would be nice, but would cost way more than McBeane would be willing to spend, and only has 1-2 years left before going out to pasture. He'll go to a contender.
  24. If Moore is signed, Peterman will beat him out with ease & he'll be cut in preseason. I don't even consider Moore a feasible Bridge QB option, no thanks.
  25. Mathews is absolutely NOT a fit for what we need. He is strictly a possession WR, best suited for the slot. We already have 2 possession guys, don't need a 3rd, what we need is a deep threat.
×
×
  • Create New...