Warren Zevon

Rush is on the radio right now saying how good the oil crash is for the airlines because they will get cheaper jet fuel.

A commie like me wouldn't charge you a dime.

Would posting hundreds of links regarding Covid-19 within the last month be feeding into the hysteria? Asking for a boy man.

Careful with that picture we don't want to doxx 3th thing

Facts are hard, I know. Where is Comrade Fudge to pump us up about the market this lovely, sunny, Monday morning?

What a ***** snowflake to start this thread. Tibs-like

Oil way down. Lots of tension in the middle east.

How dare ye insult the God!

He did not. It was a fake Tweet. Even the conservative blog that promoted the Tweet says it was fake. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/02/schuminations-hiding-the-truth.php HOAXED: My apologies to readers. The allegedly deleted Schumer tweet does not appear in Pro Publica’s authoritative list of deleted Schumer tweets. I regret not verifying the authenticity of the deleted tweet before posting this. I’m declaring it a hoax. I plead in mitigation that I trusted Glenn!

Most people on the left did not rip on Trump for closing our borders to China, though. In fact, I don't think anyone ripped Trump for that. I'd like to see an example. It's a moronic statement by a moron whose head is so far up there it's somewhere between Trump's stomach and large intestine by now.

You should know what you're talking about when you post in the dungeon. They're all going to be arrested. Nobody is skating. Durham is about to pound down the door.

No more testing for pot but they'll be tested once a year? hmm

Creeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeepy creepy

Creepy that you joke around about this dude. Very, very creepy.

Schumer is a moron. He needs to apologize, shut the ***** up about it, and rally support across the aisle in the Senate for the Covid 19 bill that passed the House yesterday.

Soon, right?

Sean Smith/Sean Davis, collision/collusion - we all make mistakes. No need to be an ass about it Your point is fair. I've always thought collusion with Russia was plausible as the Trump campaign continuously had contacts with Russians but to suggest 100k in Facebook ads swayed the election is going too far for me until I see some concrete evidence.

Sure but you're assuming I have ever said 100k swayed votes for POTUS. Never have - try Google as the search function on here sucks.

A lot of Americans are quite stupid. I disagree that everyone ignored Bloomberg's big spend. It got him in the race and people voted for him in primaries. Do you think without the $500 million full media barrage Bloomberg would gotten the same amount of votes in the states he ran in? His money bought a sliver of the electorate.

According to Betfair you win - congrats If you look at predictions from British gambling site Betfair, the Democratic primary has a new top-tier candidate: Mike Bloomberg. His odds of winning the Democratic nomination shot up suddenly in the middle of this week, and on February 14 he briefly passed Bernie Sanders — who has won the popular vote in the two states that have voted so far and is leading in national polls — as the candidate likeliest to win the nomination and likeliest (behind Trump) to be our next president. At the peak on Valentine’s Day, bettors on Betfair gave Bloomberg a 34.5 percent chance of winning the nomination. FiveThirtyEight’s sophisticated election model, on the other hand, rates Bloomberg’s odds of getting a plurality of delegates at 15 percent (plus some chance he’s chosen at a brokered convention), behind Biden as well as Sanders. Most experts aren’t rating him much higher than that. The consensus is that he does have a shot, but he’s far from the easy frontrunner. Do the prediction markets know something experts don’t? Maybe. But anyone who has been watching the prediction markets for the last year might have an alternative hypothesis: They’re just not very good. Before Iowa, Betfair, and competitor PredictIt gave Pete Buttigieg only an 8 percent chance of winning the most state delegate equivalents (which he did, pending a recanvass). For much of last fall, PredictIt rated Andrew Yang and Hillary Clinton as tied for third in the nomination race (neither stood a chance, and Clinton wasn’t even running). In 2016, Betfair’s final assessments of candidates in elections that year were overall very good. But there can be a lot of noise — and a lot of nonsense — along the way.

Have you gotten Tracy Beanz to call you back yet?

Did they, though? Here's Quinnipiac from February 5, 2016 - 4 years and 4 weeks ago. https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2321 Donald Trump still leads the GOP presidential pack among Republican voters nationwide, with 31 percent, followed by Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas with 22 percent and Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida with 19 percent, according to a Quinnipiac University National poll released today. Dr. Ben Carson has 6 percent, with 9 percent undecided and no other candidate above 3 percent. February 18th, 2016 - Cruz inches ahead by 2 points https://www.cnbc.com/2016/02/17/trump-falls-to-second-nationally-nbcwsj-poll.html Where can I see the evidence that Trump had less of a chance than Bloomberg did?

Your point is comparing apples and oranges. Bloomberg could have spent every penny he had and he wouldn't have won the nom. He never had a chance. Davis - see the edit

Sean Davis said Bloomberg would be president by now. It's March. The "proof" is not factually based. Carry on in the deep state.

Yes - The president is elected in November not March.