MARCELL DAREUS POWER

right wing hack

when 93% of the land can only be sold to or owned by jews, when israeli citizens can only marry jews, (also non-religious), when the right of return only applies to jews and not palestinians.... its racism and xenophobia to the fullest.

did danny batten long snap in college?

:blink:

!@#$ SCOTT WALKER!!!!!!!! :censored:

zionism is racism...

because the pats have been to 5 supberbowls in 11 years...

if hes a legit long snapper, i dont think they cut him. but yeah, if not, i doubt he makes it.

the mark ingram 3rd and 13 play makes me want to puke our d coordinator blew balls!

:sick: laces out dan!!!!!!!!!!!!

if batten can do it, then it makes sense to keep him obviously...

just playing it safe. hes got 3 months to be ready for opening day. thats all that matters...

Faced with the odds of failure and the profit scheme you've envisioned, you have a bit of a prisoner's dilemma. Does that sound like incentive to you? When riding the coat tails of others is almost as profitable as starting a business, no one starts a business. The payout scheme is flawed, and thus, no incentive. And as I've explained to you once already, risk is not relative to wealth. Your ability to accept risk is relative to wealth, but the odds of winning a bet are independent of the size of the bet. the odds are not independent if you have a monopoly on capital... ugh... risk is relative to wealth, and the success is also dependent on how much you have and put in... ever heard of advertisement???? :wallbash: the profits are not shared equally before the loan and interest is paid off. the profit goes to the person who loaned the capital. you do realize people give out loans everyday with interest? we get it, you want a free ride!

not for our current banking system, and not if capital plus interst is paid off. idiot...

kyle moore danny batten mckillop jarron gilbert nesbitt easley dickerson etc etc

limbaugh listening dipshit, he said all loans are risk... in their current form they are not all risk....

Well you've finally said something that is factually correct. you dont think if i give you a loan to start a business with interest is a fact? loans from our current banking system are not risks. its fiat, its not real money. no, they are not. it depends on if its paid off plus interest, then all risk belongs to labor. ok, finally!

read the lemon tree and you will have a decent understanding of the israeli-palestinian conflict. i dont think the bible is a good source. :blink:

dwan is better than spencer, thats why he started....

If you lose, you lose the $50. Is there anyone alive who would do this? do you even understand business? people open business every day knowing they might fail... its called interest, lol..... every loan in some sense is a risk man.( its not with our current banking system). whether it be a bond, money, or capital... again, once the capital and interest is paid off, then it belongs to workers. otherwise that person is getting a free ride. ie interest forever.... i mean you can buy a small building and open a bar, but if people dont like it, well, i guess you will live there now instead of selling beer. if you take out a loan, that is a potential risk off future projections. might work, might not... of course the risk is relative to the wealth you have...

I just said the incentive is profit...

nix said carrington will be a dt

for anyone to ever start a business, since the people you hire can just vote themselves the upside (after 'Capital' is 'paid off' -- again whatever that means. I don't think you fully understand the context in which your own arguments would or could exist, to be honest). You don't seem to understand that however 'fair' the outcomes , innovation would completely stagnate. Incentives matter. This is the difference between reading a book thinking "Hey! This is fair!" and then realizing what those kinds of ideas would look like in the world where people live, respond, and work. The reason that the 'state' (I'm assuming you mean the law) plays this role is because, by and large, most people seem to realize that That innovation, wealth creation, and ever higher standards of living come from investment. From trial and error. From success and failure. None of which would exist without making sure that the Without upside, there is no investment. the incentive is profit depending on what the market wants for your product... the incentive is profit, just like with interest. capital and money invested are the same thing. the both represent the value of labor in a market. i said im against capital hierachy, (ie free money), but for free markets with some basic rules of the road. there are many different structures that can exist in markets.... there are no utopias, only better and worse political systems... labor in any system creates the higher standard of living. all the surplus value is created by labor. this is literally fact. e.g. --- when you give me 5$ and i pay you back 7$, you still dont own all my labor. same with a hammer. when i pay you back the value of the hammer plus interest, this does not mean you own all my labor and can claim the houses i create. i paid you back already the value plus more of the hammer. same goes for land or any other form of investment or capital... you dont get to sit back forever, not work, and claim what i work for. there is another name for that, feudalism.... how else do you think the kennedy family got rich buying all that land in chicago....

i dont think what youre talking about is based in any sense of reality..... it was a british mandate. maybe you would be ok if we partition your familys property....

im not worried about any of their players. their d is really tough and good. goal number 1 to set up our pass rush- STOP THE RUN!!!!!!!!!