boyst

Point went right past you. No one cares about the boycot that you're missing. The stats were padded by counting people never counted before. Counting the one unit at my neighbors had 12 kids over watching it to count 12 instead of 1 this year. The past so many years it always counted as 1 or however many in the household. The super bowl had 4 viewers: eagles fans, people wanting to see the chiefs fans, people who watched it to be cool, and chiefs fans/12 yr old girls who like Taytay.

I see every mock giving us a CB referencing zone coverage. I don't think we go purely on zone coverage.

You seem like a fungi so let's dance. Your argument is that it is more accurate because people wear devices. That 100k people represent the makeup of Nielson, that is it, everybody's talking about that being a strong enough makeup who believes in this bit of coconuts. Sorry to Jump Into the Fire, but it's a lot more complex than this. These devices may be catching drift. Someone in a bar with the game on but not there for the game. The housewife doing the dishes not watching the game. Me, watching Twilight Zone with the dog, just Me and My Arrow. Nielson is using 100k people to propagate statistics. We don't know what the demographics and how they are weighed. Historically, as of recent the 50+ watches the most TV so the majority of these folks are over fifty - but that is because they watch TV from the time they get home until the late night shows. However, the largest demographic shift of daytime viewership, specifically mid morning to late morning is black women who watch most of their TV in the morning. The 35-50 age group watches evening TV after 8. Nielson uses these factors to measure their TV viewership. It isn't an en masse system to count all 100k at one time. They count and weigh how many of their P1 viewers are engaged during the time studied. Further, if they're now finally getting a full viewership based on ooh than how can they say the past results were accurate? You have to pad equal weight to the inflation of this year's numbers to those. That's how statistics work. Regardless, you're breaking my heart that statistics and the understanding of this process is awful by the laymen standard. Spaceman. Ok. That's like 11 titles in there. That was fun.

By what metric? These metrics propped up by these corporations to get headlines and clout is just like Beyonce winning a Grammy.

100% don't believe it is accurate. Most people watched via broadcast month monitored means. People watched in sections. To see the chiefs lose, people checked in then left. That's about it.

I much prefer pickle rick if I may be honest

You don't get to decide that.

Some objectifying them really does it all for equality!!!111

Zach ertz as TE#3 and John Skelton as backup.

Panthers games pack the concourse for social notoriety more than anything. All the finance bros especially. It's pretty embarrassing.

Yes. But both teams have been recently so the joy is lessened. Eagles fans aren't as doe hard people pretend, also.

Reid has the time to get it. It's not like he is parenting or takes time for his family. The only thing standing in his way is type 2.

100% they will. The meth heads that Chiefs fan spent all their money on meth, and Eagles fans can't afford to leave the city.

Fun bet. I won't watch it.

Reid ain't going anywhere until he gets the wins record.

For a 6th round in 2037, and if the niners eat his salary.

🤔

RIP coach Rejoice however...your legacy: @Jauronimo lives on forever.

Trumaine Edmunds takes casualties. It's reported that this woman passed after being reminded of the contract that the young Edmunds, 19 years old, signed with the Bears.

In January 2026 when we are wondering how Josh scores 37 and we allowed highest on average ppg again in the playoffs to lose again so we fire another DC and promote another DC and keep McDermott.

RIP. What a great life to live; 102 years. For the football side - the NFL is better with a good Bears team.

The NFL doesn't even care about the game day experience or the fans at the game. They want TV viewership and TV packages. Checking out and just watching games on TV is what the NFL wants. More commercials. Can't sell content to the fans at the stadium.

This and the onside kick return for TD were amazing plays.

That's who it was! It was the next year where we were at the Ravens that was just as dumb. We cut DiMarco to have young gronk play FB and then get bulldozed on the opening play.

That and the Chargers game were among the most miserable games to open a season. The chargers game was terribly hot and we played like ***** The Jets opener where two kickoffs, including the opening KO of OT was returned for TD's was lousy but exciting.