boyst

I think people forgot how impactful it was back then, it was very bad. Many people knew it was b******* just by the smell of it.

He's had several chances and chased money. He's one of a million examples of guys looking for money over championships. Few players care about a ring. Put yourself in their shoes. You can go be an executive at Amazon making $250k or go work for Temu for $450k?

A bull#### excuse people too often make is "they're just introverted." B word, don't get a job where you work with people then. Greeters at a store or cashier's who don't say a word, ushers at events who just sit in clusters, wait staff who generally don't pay attention to the world, gym staff who do absolutely nothing... Professionalism, integrity, and workplace discipline have died.

Elite high schoolers would beat him.

Can't wait to watch Tyreek and s many people be made fools of for not knowing track speed.

Either way, don't pay him. Make him try and sit out.

Whaley wasn't on the owners daughter. It was some chick from Grand Island and a few others. Dude was baaaaddddddddd

100%

Goes by Jamie... According to this... But many articles fail to article she described herself as trans. We have a mental health crisis.

A troon was arrested in Indiana for planning to conduct a mass shooting at her school today. She went by Jamie online, wanting to be a boy. Let's see how much traction this gets.

His nephew, Shy Tuttle, is in his 6th year playing DT for Carolina, formerly New Orleans (who drafted him). Perry is seen in town one in a while. This is where McDermott was out of his league. Dennison may have been the OC at the time, I can't remember. But it was absolutely horseshit to have put Peterman in the Chargers game. The locker room tone changed with McDermott at that point and was finalized in the 13 seconds game. We had to rebuild the roster by getting rid of good guys because they saw through him.

This is the only answer. For the hype he got to be a reasonable backup, a potential impact player as a one day starter - the dude was a bum.

Detroit bringing in former Bills RB Tashard Choice as their RB Coach.

I don't. No running back is over $8mm unless it is one of a special calibre - only Barkley. Taylor is overrated, Henry is over the hills, Mixon is a clown, CMC is glass, Mostert and Achane became ass, Gibbs and Ky Irving and Breece Hall all do well. Cook is right there in the mix with those guys but more dependable based on health. But, sorry, Charlie... You're a running back and this is a business. You get paid by the second team you go to. His attitude alone will keep him from ever being as great as he thinks. There's a reason someone like Devin Singleterry is still playing and James Cook doesn't have that.

Lol. Good riddance. Thanks for what you did and bye.

30 other backs could do what he did on this offense. Davis had a 99 yard game against the Jets defense, Johnson had incredible games. This OL and Josh Allen give any RB a chance to shine. There are 2 or 3 great running backs in the league - Cook is not there. He's great but not what we need to pay for when we can get a hungry player for cheaper. Hell, even Joe Mixon who's the same level, only for $8.5mm.

Or both.

Yes, now you're starting to understand now let's walk this out. This year they finally started including others in their ratings. Others that were additional or going to parties or stuff like that. In the past those events happened in those people were never captured. In the past in the captivating game a lot of people would go watch this. A lot of people would remain engaged or check back in during the falcons Patriots game. This year's entirely different because they were able to capture those people supposedly in the past they didn't, which is suspect. You can't claim this is the highest watch super bowl if you suddenly change the metrics on how you measure.

Point went right past you. No one cares about the boycot that you're missing. The stats were padded by counting people never counted before. Counting the one unit at my neighbors had 12 kids over watching it to count 12 instead of 1 this year. The past so many years it always counted as 1 or however many in the household. The super bowl had 4 viewers: eagles fans, people wanting to see the chiefs fans, people who watched it to be cool, and chiefs fans/12 yr old girls who like Taytay.

I see every mock giving us a CB referencing zone coverage. I don't think we go purely on zone coverage.

You seem like a fungi so let's dance. Your argument is that it is more accurate because people wear devices. That 100k people represent the makeup of Nielson, that is it, everybody's talking about that being a strong enough makeup who believes in this bit of coconuts. Sorry to Jump Into the Fire, but it's a lot more complex than this. These devices may be catching drift. Someone in a bar with the game on but not there for the game. The housewife doing the dishes not watching the game. Me, watching Twilight Zone with the dog, just Me and My Arrow. Nielson is using 100k people to propagate statistics. We don't know what the demographics and how they are weighed. Historically, as of recent the 50+ watches the most TV so the majority of these folks are over fifty - but that is because they watch TV from the time they get home until the late night shows. However, the largest demographic shift of daytime viewership, specifically mid morning to late morning is black women who watch most of their TV in the morning. The 35-50 age group watches evening TV after 8. Nielson uses these factors to measure their TV viewership. It isn't an en masse system to count all 100k at one time. They count and weigh how many of their P1 viewers are engaged during the time studied. Further, if they're now finally getting a full viewership based on ooh than how can they say the past results were accurate? You have to pad equal weight to the inflation of this year's numbers to those. That's how statistics work. Regardless, you're breaking my heart that statistics and the understanding of this process is awful by the laymen standard. Spaceman. Ok. That's like 11 titles in there. That was fun.

By what metric? These metrics propped up by these corporations to get headlines and clout is just like Beyonce winning a Grammy.

100% don't believe it is accurate. Most people watched via broadcast month monitored means. People watched in sections. To see the chiefs lose, people checked in then left. That's about it.

I much prefer pickle rick if I may be honest

You don't get to decide that.